Online backchannel as a formative assessment in improving writing skills

Entika Fani Prastikawati, Wiyaka Wiyaka, AB Prabowo Kusumo Adi

Abstract


Technology integration in language assessment has been regarded as a common strategy in an educational setting. However, teachers need to adjust the perception and cogency of assessment in an online setting as well as the concept of formative assessment in online environments. This research aimed to investigate the students' perception of online backchannel implementation as a formative assessment in improving the students' writing skills in an English classroom. For this purpose, a mixed-method was applied with a closed-ended questionnaire distributed to 32 students and semi-structured interviews carried out to 24 students at the eighth-grade students of a state junior high school in Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia. The collected data were then analyzed quantitatively using SPSS 23 and qualitatively. The findings revealed positive perceptions of online backchannel implementation as a formative assessment in improving their writing skills. They considered it a new and innovative process of an assessment that helped them get the maximum result of writing. Furthermore, students' motivation and confidence in writing were raised. This study's implication calls for the implementation of online backchannel in English class as a formative assessment during the writing process.

Keywords


online backchannel; formative assessment; writing skills

Full Text:

PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 468 times | PDF view : 205 times

References


Adas, D., & Bakir, A. (2013). Writing difficulties and new solutions: Blended learning as an approach to improve writing abilities. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(9), 254–266. Retrieved from https://www.ijhssnet.com/journal/index/1819

Agbayahoun, J. P. (2016). Teacher written feedback on student writing: Teachers’ and learners’ perspectives. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(10), 1895-1904. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0610.01

Akhiar, A., Mydin, A.- A., & Kasuma, S. A. A. (2017). Students’ perceptions and attitudes towards the use of Instagram in English language writing. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, (Special Issue), 47–72. Retrieved from http://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/mjli/article/view/7796

Al Zumor, A. W. Q., Al Refaai, I. K., Eddin, E. A. B., & Al-Rahman, F. H. A. (2013). EFL students’ perceptions of a blended learning environment: Advantages, limitations and suggestions for improvement. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n10p95

Ally, M., & Samaka, M. (2013). Open education resources and mobile technology to narrow the learning divide. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(2), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i2.1530

Al-Naibi, I., Al-Jabri, M., & Al-Kalbani, I. (2018). Promoting students’ paragraph writing using Edmodo: An action research. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 130–137. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1165747.pdf

Andrei, E. (2017). Technology in teaching English language learners: The Case of three middle school teachers. TESOL Journal, 8(2), 409–431. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.280

Baleni, Z. G. (2015). Online formative assessment in higher education: Its pros and cons. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(4), 228–236. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1062122.pdf

Barhoumi, C., & Rossi, P. G. (2013). The effectiveness of instruction-oriented hypertext systems compared to direct instruction in e-learning environments. Contemporary Educational Technology, 4(4), 281–308. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6109

Baron, D., Bestbier, A., Case, J. M., & Collier-Reed, B. I. (2016). Investigating the effects of a backchannel on university classroom interactions: A mixed-method case study. Computers & Education, 94, 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.007

Bozkurt, A., Aydin, B., Taşkiran, A., & Koral, E. (2016). Improving creative writing skills of EFL learners through microblogging. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education-July, 6(3), 88–98. Retrieved from https://www.tojned.net/journals/tojned/articles/v06i03/v06i03-07.pdf

Burner, T. (2016). Formative assessment of writing in English as a foreign language. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(6), 626–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1066430

Cakrawati, L. M. (2017). Students’ perceptions on the use of online learning platforms in EFL classroom. English Language Teaching and Technology Journal, 1(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.17509/elt%20tech.v1i1.9428

Carpenter, J. P. (2015). Digital backchannels: Giving every student a voice. Educational Leadership, 72(5), 854–858. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/may15/vol72/num08/Digital-Backchannels@-Giving-Every-Student-a-Voice.aspx

Chun, D., Kern, R., & Smith, B. (2016). Technology in Language use, language teaching, and language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12302

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Dashtestani, R. (2013). Implementing mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) in an EFL context: Iranian EFL teachers’ perspectives on challenges and affordances. The JALT CALL Journal, 9(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v9n2.153.

Dilidüzgün, S. (2013). The Effect of process writing activities on the writing skills of prospective Turkish teachers. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 52, 189–210. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1060398.pdf

Fareed, M., Ashraf, A., & Bilal, M. (2016). ESL learners’ writing skills: Problems, factors and suggestions. Journal of Education & Social Sciences, 4(2), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.20547/jess0421604201

Finardi, K. R., Leao, R. G., & Amorim, G. B. (2016). Mobile assisted language learning: Affordances and limitations of duolingo. Education and Linguistics Research, 2(2), 48-65. https://doi.org/10.5296/elr.v2i2.9842

Fraser, D. (2006). The creative potential of metaphorical writing in the literacy classroom. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 5(2), 93–108. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10289/3417

Friatin, L. Y. (2018). Students’ perception in teaching writing through Facebook group in EFL class. Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, 7(1), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.21580/vjv7i12739

Gan, Z., & Leung, C. (2020). Illustrating formative assessment in task-based language teaching. ELT Journal, 74(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccz048

Glessmer, M. S., Pick, M. A., & Göttsch, P. (2014). Enabling backchannel communication between a lecturer and a large group. In Proceedings of the 42nd SEFI Conference (pp. 1–8). Retrieved from https://www2.tuhh.de/zll/wp-content/uploads/0101-Glessmer.pdf

Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Old communication, new literacies: Social network sites as social learning resources. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 1130–1161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01484.x

Harunasari, S. Y., & Halim, N. (2019). Digital backchannel: Promoting Students’ engagement in EFL large class. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 14(7), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i07.9128

Harunasari, S. Y., & Rahmat, A. (2015). Call-based instruction model of speaking English. IJLECR-International Journal of Language Education and Culture Review, 1(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.21009/IJLECR.011.07

Horstmanshof, L., & Brownie, S. (2013). A scaffolded approach to discussion board use for formative assessment of academic writing skills. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.604121

Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, H.-F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.002

Jailani, J., Sugiman, S., & Apino, E. (2017). Implementing the problem-based learning in order to improve the students’ HOTS and characters. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 247-259. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.17674

Jumariati, J., & Febriyanti, E. R. (2020). LINE application: An alternative tool to develop writing abilities. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 10(1), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v10i1.1566

Kassner, L. D., & Cassada, K. M. (2017). Chat it up: Backchanneling to promote reflective practice among in-service teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(4), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2017.1357512

Kim, D., Rueckert, D., Kim, D.-J., & Daeryong. (2013). Students’ perceptions and experiences of mobile learning. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.17161/iallt.v43i2.8528

Kingston, N., & Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(4), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00220.x

Lawton, D., Vye, N., Bransford, J., Sanders, E., Richey, M., French, D., & Stephens, R. (2012). Online learning based on essential concepts and formative assessment. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(2), 244–287. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00050.x

Li, V. (2017). Social media in English language teaching and learning. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 148–153. https://doi.org/ 10.18178/ijlt.3.2.148-153.

Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. (2010). Methods in educational research: From theory to practice (2nd ed.). WILEY. Retrieved from https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Methods+in+Educational+Research%3A+From+Theory+to+Practice%2C+2nd+Edition-p-9780470436806

Malik, R. S., & Hamied, F. A. (2014). Research methods: A guide for first time researchers. Bandung: UPI Press.

Mero-Jaffe, I. (2011). ‘Is that what I said?’ interview transcript approval by participants: An aspect of ethics in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(3), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691101000304

Miftah, M. Z. (2005). Enhancing writing skill through writing process approach. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 5(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v5i1.88

Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v7i1.571

Ninomiya, S. (2016). The possibilities and limitations of assessment for learning: exploring the theory of formative assessment and the notion of "closing the learning gap". Educational Studies in Japan: International Yearbook, 10, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.7571/esjkyoiku.10.79

Ogange, B. O., Agak, J., Okelo, K. O., & Kiprotich, P. (2018). Student perceptions of the effectiveness of formative assessment in an online learning environment. Open Praxis, 10(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.1.705

Pradana, A. B. A., Fidian, A., Hajron, K. H., & Putro, H. E. (2020). Relationships among linguistic intelligence, students’ attitudes toward the use of ICT, and writing ability. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(7), 590–593. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.07.105

Prastikawati, E. F. (2018). EFL learners’ responses on the use of performance-based assessment. Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, Dan Budaya, 8(1), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.8.1.2018.75-86

Prastikawati, E. F. (2019). Dyned programme as computer assisted language learning (CALL) for university students: A perception and its impact. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 14(13), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i13.10448

Rashid, T., & Asghar, H. M. (2016). Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic performance: Examining the interrelations. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 604–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.084

Rose, H., & Syrbe, M. (2018). Assessment practices in teaching English as an international language. In J. I. Liontas, T. International Association, & M. DelliCarpini (Eds.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 1–12). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0655

Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2011). Informal formative assessment: The role of instructional dialogues in assessing students’ learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.04.003

Russell, J., Elton, L., Swinglehurst, D., & Greenhalgh, T. (2006). Using the online environment in assessment for learning: A case‐study of a web‐based course in primary care. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 465–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679209

Safitry, T. S., Mantoro, T., Ayu, M. A., Mayumi, I., Dewanti, R., & Azmeela, S. (2015). Teachers’ perspectives and practices in applying technology to enhance learning in the classroom. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 10(3), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v10i3.4356

Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications Ltd.

Setyorini, A., & Prastikawati, E. F. (2010). Teaching paragraph writing through interactive and process approaches. ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal), 1(2). 24-38 https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v1i2.184

Shute, V. J., & Rahimi, S. (2017). Review of computer-based assessment for learning in elementary and secondary education: Computer-based assessment for learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12172

Tshibalo, A. (2007). The potential impact of computer-aided assessment technology in higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 21(6), 684–693. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajhe.v21i6.25738

Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. (2007). Asynchronous Discussions and assessment in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782485

Wang, K. H., Wang, T. H., Wang, W. L., & Huang, S. C. (2006). Learning styles and formative assessment strategy: Enhancing student achievement in Web-based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00166.x

Widiastuti, I. A. M. S., Mukminatien, N. (2020). Dissonances between teachers’ beliefs and practices of formative assessment in EFL classes. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1315a

Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001

Wiyaka, Prastikawati, E. F., & Adi, A. P. K. (2019). Backchannel as an online hots-based formative assessment to improve students’ reading skills. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education and Social Science Research (ICESRE 2019). Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200318.018

Wong, K. M., & Mak, P. (2019). Self-assessment in the primary L2 writing classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 75(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.2018-0197

Yardi, S. (2006). The role of the backchannel in collaborative learning environments. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences: Indiana University (ICLS) 2006, (pp. 852–858). https://doi.dx.org/10.22318/icls2006.852

Yunus, M., & Salehi, H. (2012). The effectiveness of facebook groups on teaching and improving writing: Students’ perceptions. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 1(6), 87–96. Retrieved from https://naun.org/main/NAUN/educationinformation/17-538.pdf

Zulfiqar, K., Ali, S., & Rahim, A. (2017). Students’ perception of formative assessment at IIMC. JIIMCbur, 12(1), 55–58. Retrieved from https://www.bibliomed.org/?mno=239931




DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v10i2.2044

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 THE AUTHOR(S)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Journal on English as a Foreign Language is published by Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya in collaboration with the Association of Teachers of English Linguistics, Literature and Education (ELITE Association) in Indonesia [MoU manuscript].

Editor and Administration Address:

Department of English Language EducationFaculty of Teacher Training and Education, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya, Jalan G. Obos Komplek Islamic Centre Palangka Raya, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia, Postal Code 73111, Email: jefl@iain-palangkaraya.ac.id, Website: http://e-journal.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/jefl



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

web
stats View My Stats


Flag Counter