Efektivitas Sidang Keliling Pengadilan Agama Sampit Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Hukum Keluarga

Muhammad Zaki Hidayatullah

Abstract


 

               Research conducted by the researchers focused on three things. First, how the background of the idea of the circuit court of the Religious Courts Sampit. Second, what is the basic provisions that allow a circuit court Sampit Religious Court. Third, how the effectiveness of the implementation of the circuit court Sampit Religious Court.               This research is the study of law (legal research) is research that uses the type of sociology of law studies with persefektif EMIC. Using descriptive qualitative approach and a sociological approach to examine perceptions and behaviors that occur in the field of law. The data used in this study of primary data and secondary data. Subjects in this study there are 8 (eight) that three judges Religious Court Sampit, clerks replacement Religious Court Sampit, bailiff Religious Court Sampit, cashier/administration Religious Court Sampit, head of the Religious Affairs Office District of Seruyan Hilir Seruyan, head of the Religious Affairs Office Subdistrict Katingan Katingan Hilir district and subdistrict head of the Religious Affairs Office of the Middle Katingan Katingan. Collecting data through interviews, observation, documentation and to pengabsahannya through source triangulation techniques. Meanwhile, the data analysis through three stages, namely data reduction, display data, and Conclusion.               These results indicate that the background for the circuit court in the Religious Sampit three factors. First, the distance is quite far away. Second, geographical location or terrain traveled not only by land but there are also passing through the waterway. Third, to facilitate justice seekers get justice in the legal field. The legal basis that allows the circuit court Sampit Religious Court that the Supreme Court Circular (SEMA) No. 10 Year 2010 on Guidelines for Providing Legal Aid, gave an order from the High Court of Religion and Government Contracting Palangkaraya East Kotawaringin with DIPA funds given to the implementation of circuit courts Operational costs. While the effectiveness of the implementation circuit court conducted Religious Courts Sampit runs well and is very effective for society. The procedural law is used also law applicable in ordinary proceedings (litigation regular), which differ only in their implementation outside the Religious Court Sampit, namely in the Religious Affairs Office (KUA) local.

 


Keywords


effectiveness, tour court settlement,sampit

References


Ahmad Noeh, Zaini dan Abdul Basit Adnan, Sejarah Singkat Pengadilan Agama Islam di Indonesia, Surabaya: PT Bina Ilmu, 1980.

Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia, Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahan (QS Al-Maidah : 42, Depok: Mushaf Ar-Rusydi, 2008.

Fariha, EFEKTIVITAS PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PERCERAIAN MELALUI SISTEM SIDANG KELILING DI PENGADILAN AGAMA KABUPATEN MALANG JAWA TIMUR, Http://lib.uin-malang.ac.id/?mod=th_detail&id=10780008. Diunduh pada tanggal 28 April 2015, pukul 15:49 WIB. (dalam bentuk PDF).

Halim, Abdul, Peradilan Agama dalam Politik Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2000.

Indah Umaroh, ANALISIS SIDANG KELILING PERKARA CERAI GUGAT DI WILAYAH HUKUM PENGADILAN AGAMA MOJOKERTO MENURUT SURAT EDARAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG (SEMA) NOMOR 10 TAHUN 2010, Http://digilib.sunan-ampel.ac.id/gdl.php?mod=browse&op=read&id=jiptiai--indahumaro-9504. Diunduh pada tanggal 25 April 2015, pukul 20:53 WIB. (dalam bentuk PDF).

Lubis, Sulaikhan, Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama di Indonesia, Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2005.

Mujahidin, Ahmad, Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama dan Mahkamah Syar’iyyah di Indonesia, Jakarta: IKAHI, 2008.

R. Soeroso, Praktik Hukum Acara Perdata: Tata Cara dan Proses Persidangan, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, Cet. V, 2003.

Rasyid, Chatib, dan Syaifuddin, Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan Praktik pada Peradilan Agama,Yogyakarta: UII Perss, 2009.

Sejarah Terbentuk dan Perkembangan Pengadilan Agama Sampit. Lihat Http://pa-sampit.go.id/sejarah-peradilan, diakses pada tanggal 23 Desember 2015 pukul 09.28 WIB.

Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 10 Tahun 2010 Tentang Pedoman Pemberian bantuan hukum pasal 1 ayat (8) ditentukan sidang keliling, Http://bawas.mahkamahagung.go.id /bawasdoc/doc/sema.no_10_tahun_2010.pdf. Diunduh pada tanggal 7 Mei 2015 pukul 16:00 WIB.

Soekanto, Soerjono, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia (UI-Press), 1986.

Tahapan-tahapan persidangan dalam persidangan keliling, Http://www.pa-jakartautara.go.id/website/edukasi-masyarakat/proses-tahapan-persidangan.html. Diunduh pada tanggal 7 Mei 2015 pukul 16:00 WIB.

Tata letak dan daerah yuridiksi Pengadilan Agama Sampit, Http://www.pa-sampit.go.id/. Diunduh pada tanggal 13 Mei 2015. pukul 19:21 WIB.

Tim Penyusun, Undang-undang Peradilan Agama, UU RI Nomor 50 tahun 2009 dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam, Yogyakarta: Pena Pustaka, t.th.

Utsman, Sabian, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Progresif, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2014.

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Pasal 4 Ayat 1 dan 2 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Wilayah Hukum pengadilan Agama Sampit. Lihat Http://pa-sampit.go.id/wilayah-yuridis, diakses pada tanggal 23 Desember 2015 pukul 09.30 WIB.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/jsam.v12i2.480

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Studi Agama dan Masyarakat


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

web
stats View My Stats

Alamat Redaksi:

Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LP2M).

Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya.

Jalan George Obos Komplek Islamic Centre, Palangka Raya, Kalimantan Tengah, 73111

Telp (Muhammad Nur Effendi) Hp/WA. 085252520905.

Email: jsam.iainpky@gmail.com