Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika focuses on Science and mathematics  education, teaching and learning. Manuscripts received are texts that have never been published or are not in the process of publication in other national and international scientific journals. Script themes include: Biology Education, Physics Education, Chemistry Education, Science Education, and Mathematics Education. 

 

Section Policies

Artikel

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Every manuscript submitted to Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika is independently reviewed by at least two reviewers in the form of "double-blind review". Decision for publication, amendment, or rejection is based upon their reports/recommendation. In certain cases, the editor may submit an article for review to another, third reviewer before making a decision, if necessary. The journal will screen the paper for plagiarism using google scholar check.

 

Publication Frequency

Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematika periodically publishes 20 articles each year, published in 2 editions (June and December).

 

Call for Papers

Dear Colleagues,

  • On behalf on Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika, I am pleased to announce that the journal is now open for submissions. We invite you to submit articles on any topics that are part of the journal's editorial calendar as well as on additional topics of interest to our journal (article that was published will be given incentives).
  • Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika is a journal that publishes research results related to sains and matematic education issues. This scope be explained in focus issue per edition that addresses contemporary education issues in  biology, phisics, cemistry, and matematic.
  • The journal is published 2 times per year (Juni and December) that prioritizing scientific journals publishing research writings about religious and social, in our journal there are two languages, namely in the abstract the English language and in his articles using Indonesian. All published articles are available online. These articles undergo the rigorous double-blind peer-review process. For further details on submission standards, please see our website at:
  • The journal is managed by editors at Jurusan MIPA IAIN Palangka Raya. This Journal discuss related to science and matematic issues that deal with social issues such as education. This scope be explained in focus issue per edition that addresses contemporary education issues such as, biology, physics, cemistry, and matematic teaching and learning.
  • We will highly appreciate your kind helps to circulate this announcement to your related academic circles.

 

Sincerely,

Yatin Mulyono
Editor-in-chief

 

Publication Ethics

Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Hasil gambar untuk committee on publication ethics logo

Publication decisions

The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
 
 
Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

 


Duties of Authors

Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

Publication Fee

The authors do not need to pay for submitting, evaluating, and publishing the article in Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika

 

Similarity Checker

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.


Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable. All the manuscripts will be subjected to pre-screening of plagiarism check by using Turnitin Software. The screening process will be conducted by Editor once the mnuscript is received