Analisis kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah mahasiswa pendidikan kimia pada pembelajaran daring

Wiwik Kartika Sari, Ella Izzatin Nada

Abstract


Kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah merupakan kemampuan esensial yang harus dikuasai oleh mahasiswa pendidikan sebagai bagian dari literasi sains. Argumentasi ilmiah merupakan kemampuan mengkaitkan klaim, bukti ilmiah dan alasan yang rasional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah mahasiswa pendidikan kimia pada proses pembelajaran daring. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dengan subjek penelitian 20 mahasiswa pendidikan kimia semester 2 yang mengambil mata kuliah kimia dasar II. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengukur kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah mahasiswa adalah instrumen penilaian berpikir tingkat tinggi yang terdiri dari 5 soal. Instrumen tersebut telah divalidasi melalui proses expert judgment dan dinyatakan valid. Hasil analisis data menunjukan bahwa kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah mahasiswa pendidikan kimia selama proses pembelajaran daring berada pada kategori sedang. Kemampuan argumentasi mahasiswa rata – rata berada pada level 1-2. Hasil penelitian ini dapat digunakan sebagai dasar untuk merencanakan proses pembelajaran. Kegiatan yang melibatkan argumentasi mahasiswa perlu ditingkatkan untuk mengembangkan kemampuan pemahaman konsep dan keterampilan berargumentasi.


Keywords


argumnetasi ilmiah, kesetimbangan kimia, pembelajaran daring

Full Text:

PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 198 times | PDF view : 528 times

References


Alqahtani, M. (2015). The importance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education, III(3), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.20472/te.2015.3.3.002

Aufschnaiter, C. Von, Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to Learn and Learning to Argue : Case Studies of How Students ’ Argumentation Relates to Their Scientific Knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea

Aydeniz, M, & Ozdilek, Z. (2015). Assessing Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Understanding of Scientific Argumentation: What Do They Know About Argumentation After Four Years of College Science? In Science Education International (Vol. 26).

Aydeniz, Mehmet, & Dogan, A. (2016). Exploring the impact of argumentation on pre-service science teachers’ conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00170f

Bathgate, M., Crowell, A., Schunn, C., Cannady, M., & Dorph, R. (2015). The Learning Benefits of Being Willing and Able to Engage in Scientific Argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1590–1612.

Cetin, P. S. (2014). Explicit argumentation instruction to facilitate conceptual understanding and argumentation skills. Research in Science and Technological Education, 32(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2013.850071

Cigdemoglu, C., Arslan, H. O., & Cam, A. (2017). Argumentation to foster pre-service science teachers’ knowledge, competency, and attitude on the domains of chemical literacy of acids and bases. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(2), 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp00167j

Demircioglu, G., Demircioglu, H., & Yadigaroglu, M. (2013). An Investigation of Chemistry Student Teachers’ Understanding of Chemical Equilibrium. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4(2), 192–199.

Devi, N. D. C., Susanti VH, E., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2018). Analysis of High School Students’ Argumentation Ability in the topic of Buffer Solution. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia), 3(3), 141. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkpk.v3i3.23308

Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012

Faize, F. A., Husain, W., & Nisar, F. (2018). A critical review of scientific argumentation in science education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80353

Hakyolu, H., & Ogan-Bekiroglu, F. (2016). Interplay between content knowledge and scientific argumentation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(12), 3005–3033. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02319a

Haruna, A., & Nahadi. (2021). Menjelajahi Hubungan Level Argumentasi Dengan Ikatan Kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 15(1), 2686–2694.

Hasnunidah, N., Susilo, H., Irawati, M., & Suwono, H. (2019). The contribution of argumentation and critical thinking skills on students’ concept understanding in different learning models. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 17(1).

Heng, L. L., Surif, J., & Seng, C. H. (2014). Individual Versus Group Argumentation : Student ’ s Performance in a Malaysian Context. International Education Studies, 7(7), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n7p109

Kaya, E. (2013). Argumentation Practices in Classroom: Pre-service teachers’ conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 35(7), 1139–1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.770935

Khishfe, R. (2012). Relationship Between Nature of Science Understandings and Argumentation Skills : A Role for Counterargument and Contextual Factors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 489–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21012

Lazarou, D., Erduran, S., & Sutherland, R. (2017). Argumentation in science education as an evolving concept: Following the object of activity. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 14(May), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.05.003

Lee, H.-S., Pallant, A., Pryputniewicz, S., & Liu, O. L. (2013). Measuring s tudents’ scientific argumentation associated with uncertain current science. National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 1–47.

Nunez, J. R., & Leeuwner, J. (2020). Changing Courses in Midstream: COVID-19 and the Transition to Online Delivery in Two Undergraduate Chemistry Courses ́ ̃. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2819–2824. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00781

Pallant, A., & Lee, H. (2014). Constructing Scientific Arguments Using Evidence from Dynamic Computational Climate Models. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 24(378–395). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9499-3

Putria, H., Maula, L. H., & Uswatun, D. A. (2020). Analisis Proses Pembelajaran Dalam Jaringan (DARING) Masa Pandemi COVID-19 pada Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(4), 861–872. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i4.460

Ramachandran, R., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2020). Student Perspectives on Remote Learning in a Large Organic Chemistry Lecture Course. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2565–2572. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00572

Rigianti, H. A. (2020). Kendala Pembelajaran Daring Guru Sekolah Dasar di Kabupaten Banjarnegara. Elementary School, 7(2), 297–302.

Riwayani, R., Perdana, R., Sari, R., Jumadi, J., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). Analisis kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa pada materi optik : Problem- based learning berbantuan edu-media simulation Analyz. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(1), 45–53.

Roviati, E., & Widodo, A. (2019). Kontribusi Argumentasi Ilmiah dalam Pengembangan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis. Titian Ilmu: Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Sciences, 11(2), 56–66.

Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to Teach Argumentation : Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500336957

Songsil, W., Pongsophon, P., Boonsoong, B., & Clarke, A. (2019). Developing scientific argumentation strategies using revised argument-driven inquiry (rADI) in science classrooms in Thailand. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0035-x

Stupple, E. J. N., Maratos, F. A., Elander, J., Hunt, T. E., Cheung, K. Y. F., & Aubeeluck, A. V. (2017). Development of the Critical Thinking Toolkit (CriTT): A measure of student attitudes and beliefs about critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.007

Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The Uses of Argument , Updated Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Wahdan, W. Z., Sulistina, O., & Sukarianingsih, D. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Berargumentasi Ilmiah Materi Ikatan Kimia Peserta Didik Sma, Man, Dan Perguruan Tinggi Tingkat I. J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia), 2(2), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.17977/um026v2i22017p030




DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/eds.v10i2.3173

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 198 times
PDF - 528 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Contact Person:

Luvia Ranggi Nastiti (Can't talk, WhatsApp only +62 811520115)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.