Analisis tanggapan pengguna digitex infusion pada pembelajaran STEM
Abstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menguji respon guru dan peserta didik terhadap media ajar berupa DigitEx (Digital Explanation) Infusion untuk membantu penjelasan atas proyek STEM yang dilakukan peserta didik. Populasi penelitian ialah seluruh sekolah menengah pertama (SMP) yaitu sebanyak 4 sekolah di Singkawang Tengah. Jumlah sampel yang terlibat sebanyak 87 orang dari seluruh populasi. Instrument yang dipakai dalam penelitian ini pada study ini berupa instrument non-tes dan telah divalidasi oleh pakar sehingga instrument layak pakai. Proses analisis data menggunakan rubrik dengan teknik/ metode holistik. Analisis pada penelitian ini difokuskan pada tanggapan peserta didik terhadap aspek penciptaan dari DigitEx yang dipecah menjadi tiga indikator utama yaitu indicator kombinasi digital, kejelasan latar suara dan tampilan informasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa indikator kombinasi digital adalah yang tertinggi sebesar 96,55%, dan latar suara menjadi indikator terendah sebanyak 89,7 %. Diharapkan dengan adanya media DigitEx ini, maka proses memadukan konsep STEM ke dalam pembelajaran di sekolah dasar maupun sekolah menengah menjadi lebih massif.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFArticle Metrics
Abstract view : 209 times | PDF view : 129 timesReferences
Akcay, S. (2016). Analysis of analogy use in secondary education science textbooks in Turkey. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(19), 1841–1851. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2016.2984
Barth, A. E., Vaughn, S., Capin, P., Cho, E., Stillman-Spisak, S., Martinez, L., & Kincaid, H. (2016). Effects of a text-processing comprehension intervention on struggling middle school readers. Topics in Language Disorders, 36(4), 368–389. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000101
Batsila, M., & Tsihouridis, C. (2016). “Once upon a Time there was...” a digital world for junior high school learners. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(3), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i03.5370
Benegas, J., & Flores, J. S. (2019). Does pedagogy influence gains and losses of conceptual understanding? Revista Mexicana de Fisica E, 65(2), 195–199. https://doi.org/10.31349/RevMexFisE.65.195
Chanthala, C., Santiboon, T., & Ponkham, K. (2018). Instructional designing the STEM education model for fostering creative thinking abilities in physics laboratory environment classes. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1923, 030010. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5019501
Chasteen, S. (2017). Teaching and learning stem: a practical guideteaching and learning STEM: a practical guide , Richard M. Felder and Rebecca Brent, Jossey-Bass, 2016, 336 p, $45.00, ISBN 978-1-118-92581-2 . Physics Today, 70(5), 57–57. https://doi.org/10.1063/pt.3.3556
Choi, G. Y. (2018). Learning through digital storytelling: exploring entertainment techniques in lecture video. Educational Media International, 55(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1439710
Djulia, E., Hasruddin, H., Arwita, W., Simatupang, Z., Brata, W. W. W., Sipayung, M., ... & Purnama, D. (2020). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Biologi. Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Schulz, R. (2017). What Really Makes Secondary School Students “Want” to Study Physics? Education Sciences, 7(4), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7040084
Hair, J. F., L.D.S. Gabriel, M., da Silva, D., & Braga Junior, S. (2019). Development and validation of attitudes measurement scales: fundamental and practical aspects. RAUSP Management Journal, 54(4), 490–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-05-2019-0098
Halim, L., Yong, T. K., Subahan, T., & Meerah, M. (2014). Overcoming students ’ misconceptions on forces in equilibrium: an action research study. Creative Education, 5(June), 1032–1042. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.511117
Inaltun, H., & Ateş, S. (2015). Investigating relationships among pre-service science teachers’ conceptual knowledge of electric current, motivational beliefs and self-regulation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(6), 1657–1676. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1494a
Kakarndee, N., Kudthalang, N., & Jansawang, N. (2018). The integrated learning management using the STEM education for improve learning achievement and creativity in the topic of force and motion at the 9th grade level. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1923. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5019515
Kotluk, N., & Kocakaya, S. (2016). Researching and evaluating digital storytelling as a distance education tool in physics instruction: An application with pre-service physics teachers. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.59900
Kurniawan, Y., & Muliyani, R. (2019). A development design of digital story conceptual change-oriented in physics subject. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 4(2), 110. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v4i2.1153
Kurniawan, Y., Muliyani, R., & Nassim, S. (2019). Digital story conceptual change-oriented (dscc) to reduce student misconceptions in physics. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-BiRuNi, 08(October), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v0i0.4596
Liu, M., & Keusch, F. (2017). Effects of scale direction on response style of ordinal rating scales. Journal of Official Statistic, 33(1), 137–154.
Mabruri, H., Ahmadi, F., & Suminar, T. (2019). The development of science mobile learning media to improve primary students learning achievements. Journal of Primary Education, 8(56), 108–116.
Metruk, R. (2018). The journal of teaching english for specific and academic purposes comparing holistic and analytic ways of scoring in the assessment of speaking skills. The Journal of Teaching English For Specific and Academic Purposes, 611189(1), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1801179M
Muliyani, R. (2018). The implementation of refutation text in predict-observe-explain (POE) learning model to decrease students’ misconception. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(2), 62–71. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JERE
Nassim, S. (2018). Digital storytelling: an active learning tool for improving students’ language skills. PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 2(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2018.21.1427
Nite, S. B., Capraro, M. M., Capraro, R. M., & Bicer, A. (2017). Explicating the characteristics of STEM teaching and learning: a metasynthesis. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.30707/jste52.1nite
Özpinar, İ., Gökçe, S., & Yenmez, A. A. (2017). Effects of digital storytelling in mathematics instruction on academic achievement and examination of teacher-student opinions on the process. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(10), 137. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i10.2595
Pujiati, A. (2019). Peningkatan literasi sains dengan pembelajaran stem di era revolusi industri 4.0. Diskusi Panel Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1).
Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2014). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Routledge.
Sanabria, J. C., & Arámburo-Lizárraga, J. (2017). Enhancing 21st century skills with AR: Using the gradual immersion method to develop collaborative creativity. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 487–501. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00627a
Sani, R. A. (2019). Pembelajaran berbasis hots edisi revisi: higher order thinking skills (Vol. 1). Tira Smart.
Sezen-Barrie, A., Stapleton, M. K., & Marbach-Ad, G. (2020). Science teachers’ sensemaking of the use of epistemic tools to scaffold students’ knowledge (re)construction in classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, July 2019, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21621
Starr, C. R., Hunter, L., Dunkin, R., Honig, S., Palomino, R., & Leaper, C. (2020). Engaging in science practices in classrooms predicts increases in undergraduates’ STEM motivation, identity, and achievement: A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, January. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21623
Taylor, P. C. (2018). Enriching STEM with the arts to better prepare 21st century citizens. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1923, 020002. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5019491
Wilmes, S. E. D., & Siry, C. (2020). Science notebooks as interactional spaces in a multilingual classroom: Not just ideas on paper. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(7), 999–1027. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21615
Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Shavelson, R. J., Schmidt, S., & Beck, K. (2019). On the complementarity of holistic and analytic approaches to performance assessment scoring. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12286
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/eds.v9i2.2219
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 209 timesPDF - 129 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Contact Person:
Luvia Ranggi Nastiti (Can't talk, WhatsApp only +62 811520115)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.