The effect of flipped learning on EFL learners’ public speaking in Taiwan

Rachid Bezzazi


This study investigates the effectiveness of flipped learning on English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ public speaking. An experimental design was implemented throughout the study, for which the researcher used convenience sampling. Seventy-nine sophomore students, from two intact English Public Speaking classes, were divided into a flipped learning group (FLG) and a conventional instruction group (CIG). This happened over a 12-week period where the focus was to investigate how a language learner’s experience of flipped learning or conventional instruction affected their English public speaking. The author used quantitative and qualitative methods to collect data: a pre- and post-in-class speech and a 250-word post-treatment reflective essay. Both an independent and paired t-test were used to analyze the scores of the speeches, whereas coding was used to specify the themes that emerged from the qualitative data. The results revealed that the FLG significantly outperformed the CIG in the areas of body language and paralanguage. In addition, they did better in the areas of content and organization, and developed other skills as will be detailed later. The findings can be an impetus for EFL instructors to adopt flipped learning in an English public speaking course.


cooperative/collaborative learning; flipped learning; teaching/learning strategies; technology-enhanced language learning (TELL)

Full Text:


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 3243 times | PDF view : 1325 times


Allen, D. (2008). Teaching. NEWSLETTER, 18(1).1-8.

Amiryousefi, M. (2017). The incorporation of flipped learning into conventional classes to enhance EFL learners’ L2 speaking, L2 listening, and engagement. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1-15.

Arnold-Garza, S. (2014). The flipped classroom teaching model and its use for information literacy instruction. Communications in Information Literacy, 8(1), 7-22.

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class everyday. Washingtom, DC: ISTE; and Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Bodie, G. D. (2010). A racing heart, rattling knees, and ruminative thoughts: Defining, explaining, and treating public speaking anxiety. Communication Education, 59(1), 70-105.

Carswell, L., Thomas, P., Petre, M., Price, B., & Richards, M. (2000). Distance education via the Internet: The student experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), 29-46.

Chen, L., Chen, T. L., & Chen, N. S. (2015). Students’ perspectives of using cooperative learning in a flipped statistics classroom. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(6), 621-640.

ChenHsieh, J., Wu, W. C., & Marek, W. M. (2017). Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1-2), 1-21.

Cole, J. E., & Kritzer, J. B. (2009). Strategies for success: Teaching an online course. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 28(4), 36-40.

Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970-977.

Educause, C. (2012). Things you should know about flipped classrooms. Retrieved from

Enfield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. TechTrends, 57(6), 14-27.

Esposito, J. (2008). In the spotlight: Overcome your fear of public speaking and performing. Capstone Publishing, Chichester.

Fauzan, A., & Ngabut, M. N. (2018). EFL students’ perception on flipped learning in writing class. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 8(2), 115-129.

Flipped Learning Network. (2014). The four pillars of F-L-I-P. Retrieved from

Gillies, R. M., & Boyle, M. (2010). Teachers’ reflections on cooperative learning: Issues in implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 933-940.

Horwitz, B. (2002). Communication apprehension: Origins and management. New York, New York: Cengage Learning.

Howitt, C., & Pegrum, M. (2015). Implementing a flipped classroom approach in postgraduate education: An unexpected journey into pedagogical redesign. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 458-469.

Huang, Y. N., & Hong, Z. R. (2016). The effects of a flipped English classroom intervention on students’ information and communication technology and English reading comprehension. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(2), 175-193.

Hung, H. T. (2017). The integration of a student response system in flipped classrooms. Language Learning & Technology, 21(1), 16–27.

Li, S., & Suwanthep, J. (2017). Integration of flipped classroom model for EFL speaking. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 118-123.

Marlowe, C. A. (2012). The effect of the flipped classroom on student achievement and stress. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Bozeman: Montana State University. Retrieved from

McLaughlin, J. E., White, P. J., Khanova, J., & Yuriev, E. (2016). Flipped classroom implementation: A case report of two higher education institutions in the United States and Australia. Computers in the Schools, 33(1), 24-37.

Nikitina, A. (2012). Successful public speaking. Bookboon. Retrieved from

Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning systems: Definitions and directions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227-234.

Pudin, C. S. J., (2017). Exploring a flipped learning approach in teaching grammar for ESL students. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 2017.

Santosa, M. H. (2017). Learning approaches of Indonesian EFL Gen Z students in a Flipped Learning context. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 7(2), 183-208.

Schreiber, L. M., Paul, G. D., & Shibley, L. R. (2012). The development and test of the public speaking competence rubric. Communication Education, 61(3), 205-233.

Shih, R. C. (2011). Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(Special issue, 5), 829- 845.

Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1), 82-83. Retrieved from

Veira, A. K., Leacock, C. J., & Warrican, S. J. (2014). Learning outside the walls of the classroom: Engaging the digital natives. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(2), 227-244.

Wen, Q. (2013). Application of the output-driven hypothesis in college English teaching; Reflections and suggestions. Foreign Language World, 6(5), 14-22.

White, P. J., Larson, I., Styles, K., Yuriev, E., Evans, D. R., Short, J. L., & Eise, N. (2015). Using active learning strategies to shift student attitudes and behaviours about learning and teaching in a research intensive educational context. Pharmacy Education, 15(1), 162–172.

Zhang, H., Du, X., Yuan, X., & Zhang, L. (2016). The effectiveness of the flipped classroom mode on the English pronunciation course. Creative Education, 7(09), 1340-1346.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 3243 times
PDF - 1325 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Journal on English as a Foreign Language

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JEFL is published by Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya in collaboration with the Association of Teachers of English Linguistics, Literature and Education (ELITE Association) in Indonesia [MoU manuscript].

Editor and Administration Address:

Department of English Language EducationFaculty of Teacher Training and Education, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya, Jalan G. Obos Komplek Islamic Centre Palangka Raya, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia, Postal Code 73111, Email:, Website:

OAI address of JEFL is available at

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

stats View My Stats

Flag Counter