Male and female students' uptake in responding to oral corrective feedback

Zaky Dzulhiza Hawin Amalia, Endang Fauziati, Sri Marmanto


This study aims at investigating male and female students’ ‘uptake’ to the lecturer’s oral corrective feedback (OCF). This study used a qualitative method using a case study design. Thirty-nine students in the English Education Department participated in this study. They consisted of eleven male students and twenty-eight female students. All participants in this study were taking Survival Speaking class. The data were collected through observation of six hours of speaking classroom interaction. It was then analyzed through three stages: data condensation, data displays and drawing conclusion, and verification. The findings revealed that explicit correction is the most widely used and leads to the most amount of repair. The data obtained from the male students show that explicit correction leads to uptake with repair, whereas the four implicit feedback strategies i.e. clarification request, metalinguistic feedback, elicitation, and repetition mostly lead to uptake with need-repair. Furthermore, the data obtained from the female students show that explicit correction, recast, and metalinguistic feedback mostly lead to uptake with repair, whereas clarification request, elicitation, and repetition mostly lead to uptake with need-repair. Hence, the results of this study will show us which type of oral corrective feedback induces successful feedback and uptake.


oral corrective feedback; uptake; male and female students; foreign language teaching

Full Text:


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 2564 times | PDF view : 770 times


Abaya, R. (2014). Corrective feedback in English language teaching and learning: Which way to go? International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 2(10), 5–12.

Alsolami, E. H., & Elyas, T. (2016). Investigating teachers’ corrective feedback and learners’ uptake in the EFL classrooms. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 3(1), 115–132.

Carvalho, C., Santos, J., Conboy, J., & Martins, D. (2014). Teachers’ feedback: exploring differences in students’ perceptions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, 169–173.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. California: SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. California: SAGE Publications.

Ellis, R. (2006). Researching the effects of form-focused instruction on L2 acquisition. AILA Review, 19(1), 18–41.

Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 3–18.

Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., Goldsmith, H. H., & Van Hulle, C. A. (2006). Gender differences in temperament: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 33–72.

Fu, T., & Nassaji, H. (2016). Corrective feedback, learner uptake, and feedback perception in a Chinese as a foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 159.

Gitsaki, C., & Althobaiti, N. (2010). ESL teachers’ use of corrective feedback and its effect on learners’ uptake. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 7(1), 197–219.

Haghani, M. (2012). Corrective feedback and the students’ uptake. ELT Weekly, 4(1). Retrieved from

Jabu, B., Noni, N., Talib, A., & Syam, A. (2017). Lecturers’ use of corrective feedback and students’ uptake in an Indonesian EFL context. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 19(1), 82–87.

Katayama, A. (2007). Students’ perceptions toward corrective feedback to oral errors. Asian EFL Journal, 9, 289–305.

Khorshidi, E., & Rassaei, E. (2013). The effects of learners’ gender on their preferences for corrective feedback. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 1(4), 71–83.

Leiter, J. (2010). Corrective feedback and uptake in the advanced learner classroom. Wien University, Austria.

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66.

Miles, M. B., & Hubberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (the 3rd ed.). California: SAGE Publications.

Milicev, J. (2014). Correct me if I’m wrong, but do it right: Error correction and learner uptake in university-level EFL classrooms. Athens Journal of Philology, 1(4), 259–271.

Nuramirah, P. (2017). An Analysis of teacher’s corrective feedback and learners’ uptake in dialogue journal. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 9). Bandung, Indonesia: Atlantis Press.

Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 573–595.

Phuong, T. T. B., & Huan, N. B. (2018). Teacher corrective feedback on students’ speaking performance and their uptake in EFL classes. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 3(3), 110–131.

Simbolon, M. (2015). An analysis of grammatical errors on speaking activities. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 5(2), 71.

Taipale, P. (2012). Oral errors, corrective feedback and learner uptake in an EFL setting. University of Jyvaskyla, Finland.

Xia, X. (2013). Gender differences in using language. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(8), 1485–1489.

Xu, S. (2012). An investigation into teachers’ corrective feedback in Chinese EFL classrooms. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(4).

Yoshida, R. (2008). Teachers’ choice and learners’ preference of corrective feedback types. Language Awareness, 17(1), 78–93.

Zhao, B. (2009). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in primary school EFL classrooms in China. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 6(3), 45–72.

Zoghi, A., & Nikoopour, J. (2013). The interface of error types, teacher’s feedback, and students’ uptake. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 3(1), 54–62.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 2564 times
PDF - 770 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Journal on English as a Foreign Language

License URL:

JEFL is published by Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya in collaboration with the Association of Teachers of English Linguistics, Literature and Education (ELITE Association) in Indonesia [MoU manuscript].

Editor and Administration Address:

Department of English Language EducationFaculty of Teacher Training and Education, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya, Jalan G. Obos Komplek Islamic Centre Palangka Raya, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia, Postal Code 73111, Email:, Website:

OAI address of JEFL is available at

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

stats View My Stats

Flag Counter