Use of questioning strategy to facilitate students’ reading comprehension in Taiwan

Ike Irawati


This study investigates individual differences arising from strategy instruction, questioning strategy, based on the problems found through miscue analysis. This qualitative study also investigates students’ motivation toward the strategy taught. The participants were a college student in Taiwan, consisted of one high-achieving student and one low-achieving student. Both were on the same language proficiency level (level C). They were asked to complete miscue pre and post-test and took eight meetings of tutorials (four meetings for teacher-generated questions and four meetings for student-generated questions). An interview was also conducted to find out their motivation toward the strategy. The instructional materials were taken from an English magazine specially designed for Taiwanese, called Studio Classroom. Results indicated that the strategy did not work well in both students as their motivation interfered their reading performance. This study concludes that the strategy works better in higher motivation student. Since motivation affects students' reading performance, therefore, this study suggests that raising students' motivation in the teaching process is crucial to reach better reading performance.


miscue analysis; questioning strategy; reading comprehension; motivation

Full Text:


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 2808 times | PDF view : 336 times


Alderson, J. C. (2000). Success in English Teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.

Alfermann, D. E., & Phelphs, S.F. (2002). Content reading and literacy: Succeeding in today’s diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Anderson, L. W, Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Anisah, N. Fitriati, S. W., & Rukmini, D. (2019). Teachers’ questioning strategies to scaffold students’ learning in reading. English Education Journal, 9(1), 128-143.

Darling-Hammond, L., Austin, K., Cheung, M., & Martin, D. (2003). Thinking about thinking: Metacognition. London: Stanford University Press

Dunlap, J. A. (2006) The effects of self-questioning on comprehension of expository text and development of content writing with second-grade students, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Wichita State University. Available at:

Edwards, S., & Bowman, M. A. (1996). Promoting student learning through questioning: A study of classroom questions. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 7(2), 3-24.

El-Koumy, A. S. (2014). Effects of three questioning strategies on EFL reading comprehension. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2364867.

Goodman, Y. M., Burke, C., & Sherman, B. (1981). Reading strategies: Focus on comprehension. The English Journal on JSTOR, 70(7), 89. doi: 10.2307/817495.

Goodman, Y. M., Watson, J. D., & Burke, C. L. (1996). Reading strategies: Focus on comprehension. New York: Richard C. Owen Publishers.

Kazemi, M., Hosseini, M., & Kohandani, M. (2013). Strategic Reading Instruction in EFL Contexts. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(12), 2333-2342.

Klinger, J. K., Vaughn, S., & Boardman, A. (2007). Teaching reading comprehension to students with learning difficulties. New York: The Guildford Press.

Long, P. (1987). Reading Miscue Inventory: Alternative Procedures by Y. Goodman, D. Watson and C. Burke Published by Richard C. Owen. New York, 1987, Australasian Journal of Special Education, 3(11), 43-44. doi: 10.1017/s1030011200021825.

Macalister, J. (2011). Today’s teaching, tomorrow’s text: Exploring the teaching of reading. ELT Journal, 64(2), 161-169. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccq023.

Manset-Williamson, G., Dunn, M., Hinshaw, R. E., & Nelson, J. M. (2008). The impact of self-questioning strategy use on the text-reader assisted comprehension of students with reading disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 23(1), 123-135.

Paran, A. (1996). Reading in EFL: Facts and fictions. ELT Journal, 50(1), 25-34. doi: 10.1093/elt/50.1.25.

Phillips, D. (2003). Longman preparation course for the TOEFL test. London: Longman.

Samad, I. A., Jannah, M., & Fitriani, S. S. (2017). EFL students’ strategies dealing with common difficulties in TOEFL reading comprehension section. International Journal of Language Education, 1(1), 29-36. doi: 10.26858/ijole.v1i1.2869.

Whitmore, K., & Crowell, C. G. (1994). What makes a question good is. New Advocate, (pp. 45–57). Available at:

Wicaksono, R. T., & Munir, A. (2014). Applicability of self-questioning strategy in comprehending narrative text. Retain, 1(1), 216.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 2808 times
PDF - 336 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Journal on English as a Foreign Language

License URL:

JEFL is published by Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya in collaboration with the Association of Teachers of English Linguistics, Literature and Education (ELITE Association) in Indonesia [MoU manuscript].

Editor and Administration Address:

Department of English Language EducationFaculty of Teacher Training and Education, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya, Jalan G. Obos Komplek Islamic Centre Palangka Raya, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia, Postal Code 73111, Email:, Website:

OAI address of JEFL is available at

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

stats View My Stats

Flag Counter