Interactive game “Kahoot!†as the media of students’ vocabulary assessment
Abstract
This research aims to investigate students’ perspectives on using the interactive game “Kahoot!†as the media of vocabulary test at one of the public senior high schools in Yogyakarta Indonesia. It was qualitative research with five voluntarily participating students as the participants. An in-depth semi-structured interview was applied as the data collection technique. The theme-based analysis was used in this study. The finding shows that first, Kahoot! is more practical for a vocabulary test. Second, the game can attract the students’ attention to the test. Third, it helps the students to be more active in the classroom and the last, the game makes the students more enthusiastic in doing the test. However, this research also found some negative sides of using Kahoot!; first, the students become less confident with their score, especially when they get lower scores than other students because the scores were displayed on the leader board in Kahoot! application; second, some students had a lack of knowledge in using the application; and the last, the time was limited. This study implies that the use of Kahoot! in the EFL classroom can be an alternative for teachers to teach vocabulary and provide fun learning activities for the students.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFArticle Metrics
Abstract view : 4017 times | PDF view : 2001 timesReferences
Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input, Monitoring and Evaluation - 2. Pathfinder International. Retrieved from http://www2.pathfinder.org/site/DocServer/m_e_tool_series_indepth_interviews.pdf?docID=6301
Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 6(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-12-0205
Chotimah, I. C., & Rafi, M. F. (2018). The effectiveness of using Kahoot as a media in teaching reading. JurnalElink, 5(1), 19-29.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Dellos, R. (2015). Kahoot!: A digital game resource for learning. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(4), 49-52. https://doi.org/=10.1.1.694.5955.
Godwin- Jones, R. (2015). Emerging technologies the evolving roles of language teachers: trained coders, local researchers, global citizens. Language, Learning and Technology, 19(1), 10-22. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1051677
Graham, K. (2015). TechMatters: Getting into Kahoot!(s): Exploring a game-based learning system to enhance student learning. LOEX Quarterly, 42(3), 6-7. Retrieved from https://commons.emich.edu/loexquarterly/vol42/iss3/4
Huang, S. (2015). Mixed-method research on learning vocabulary through technology reveals vocabulary growth in second-grade students. Reading Psychology, 36(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2013.808723
Kiili, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. The Internet and higher education, 8(1), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.12.001
Lai, C. H., Lin, Y. C., Jong, B. S., & Hsia, Y. T. (2014). Adding social elements to game-based learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(3), 12-15. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v9i3.3294
Licorish, S. A., Owen, H. E., Daniel, B., & George, J. L. (2018). Students’ perception of Kahoot!’s influence on teaching and learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-018-0078-8.
MendezCoca, D., & Slisko, J., (2013). Software Socrative and Smartphones as tools for implementation of basic processes of active physics learning in classroom: An initial feasibility study with prospective teachers. Eurepean J of Physics Education, 4(2), 17-24.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Rockville, MD: NICHD Clearinghouse.
Nguyen, T. T. T., & Yukawa, T. (2019). Kahoot with smartphones in testing and assessment of language teaching and learning, the need of training on mobile devices for Vietnamese teachers and students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 9(4), 286-296. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2019.9.4.1214
Nikbakht, E., & Boshrabadi, A. M. (2015). Analysing the potential of social networking sites on EFL learners’ vocabulary mastery: A situated-learning approach. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(8), 1635-1641. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0508.13
Palmer, J., Boon, R. T., & Spencer, V. G. (2014). Effects of concept mapping instruction on the vocabulary acquisition skills of seventh-graders with mild disabilities: A replication study. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 30(2), 165-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2013.818890
Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & education, 52(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.004
Pratolo, B. W., & Solikhati, H. A. (2020). The implementation of digital literacy in Indonesian suburban EFL classes. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(1), 1508-1512.
Santosa, M. H. (2017). Learning approaches of Indonesian EFL Gen Z students in a Flipped Learning context. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 7(2), 183-208. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v7i2.689
Sharma, S. A., & Unger, S. (2016). Employing web 2.0 technologies to support students’ academic vocabulary acquisition. Michigan Reading Journal, 48(3a), 17-29.
Stowell, J. R., & Nelson, J. M. (2007). Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning, and emotion. Teaching of psychology, 34(4), 253-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280701700391
Wang, A. I. (2015). The wear out effect of a game-based student response system. Computers & Education, 82, 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.004.
Wang, A. I., & Lieberoth, A. (2016). The effect of points and audio on concentration, engagement, enjoyment, learning, motivation, and classroom dynamics using Kahoot! In T. Connolly, & L. Boyle (Eds.), Proceedings from the 10th European Conference of Game Based Learning (pp. 737-748). Reading, UK: Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited.
Yip, F. W., & Kwan, A. C. (2006). Online vocabulary games as a tool for teaching and learning English vocabulary. Educational media international, 43(3), 233-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980600641445
Zarzycka-Piskorz, E., (2016). Kahoot it or not? Can games be motivating in learning grammar? Teaching English Technology, 16(3), 17–36.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v10i1.1670
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 4017 timesPDF - 2001 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal on English as a Foreign Language

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JEFL is published by Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya in collaboration with the Association of Teachers of English Linguistics, Literature and Education (ELITE Association) in Indonesia [MoU manuscript].
Editor and Administration Address:
Department of English Language Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya, Jalan G. Obos Komplek Islamic Centre Palangka Raya, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia, Postal Code 73111, Email: jefl@iain-palangkaraya.ac.id, Website: http://e-journal.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/jefl
OAI address of JEFL is available at http://e-journal.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/jefl/oai

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.