Social construction of knowledge in synchronous text-based discussion during English language learning

Ira Mutiaraningrum, Arif Nugroho

Abstract


The uptake of remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic was indispensable. Classroom activity, including English language learning, was shifted into remote learning. However, remote learning has not escaped the question regarding its role in students' knowledge construction in language learning. Thus, this study explores whether the social construction of knowledge occurs in the same-time synchronous text-based discussion during students' English language learning. It also investigates the phasesin which the social construction of knowledge present. Content analysis of the Interaction Analysis Model was used as the method to classify twenty-three Indonesian English as foreign language students' discourses in the synchronous text-based discussion. The transcripts from two threads in Google Classroom were sorted into the Interaction Analysis Model Phases to find out the percentage of each Phase's occurrence. Results indicate that the discourses showed the social construction of knowledge was developed by students and thereby pointed out the process of their cognitive thinking during their synchronous English language learning. This study suggests that the social construction of knowledge exists in synchronous text-based discussion with the most frequent postings categorized in Phase I.


Keywords


social construction of knowledge; synchronous text-based discussion; English language learning

Full Text:

PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 1483 times | PDF view : 474 times

References


Abazi-Bexheti, L., Kadriu, A., Apostolova-Trpkovska, M., Jajaga, E., & Abazi-Alili, H. (2018). LMS solution: Evidence of Google Classroom usage in higher education. Business Systems Research Journal, 9(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2018-0003

Ajibade, S. S. M., Shamsuddin, S. M., & Bahiah, N. (2017). Analysis of social network collaborative learning on knowledge construction and social interaction of students. In ASIA International Multidisciplinary Conference (AIMC-2017). Malaysia.

Atmojo, A. E. P., & Nugroho, A. (2020). EFL classes must go online! Teaching activities and challenges during covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Register Journal, 13(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i1.49-76

Bondarenko, O., V., Mantulenko, S., V., & Pikilnyak, A., V. (2018). Google classroom as a tool of support of blended learning for geography students (Unpublished thesis). Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University, Ukraine. Retrieved from https://arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.00775

Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., Lee, M. J. W., & Kenney, J. (2015). Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: outcomes from a cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 86, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.006

Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083

Brown, B., Schroeder, M., & Eaton, S. E. (2016). Designing synchronous online interactions and Discussion. In Proceeding of the IDEAS: Designing for Innovation (pp. 51-60). Canada: University of Calgary. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED573166.pdf

Cahyono, B. Y., & Mutiaraningrum, I. (2015). Indonesian EFL teachers’ familiarity with and opinion on the internet-based teaching of writing. English Language Teaching, 9(1), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n1p199

Clark, C., Strudler, N., & Grove, K. (2015). Comparing asynchronous and synchronous video vs. text based discussions in an online teacher education course. Online Learning, 19(3), 48-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i3.668

Emanuel, R., Bell, R., Cotton, C., Craig, J., Drummond, D., Gibson, S., Harris, A., Harris, M., Hatcher-Vance, C., Jones, S., Lewis, J., Longmire, T., Nash, B., Ryans, T., Tyre, E., Walters, D., & Williams, A. (2015). The truth about smartphone addiction. College Student Journal, 49(2), 291-299. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-40646-014

France-Presse, A. (2020). More than 1 billion told to stay home worldwide over virus. The New York Time. Retrieved from https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2020/03/23/more-than-1-billion-told-to-stay-home-worldwide-over-virus.html

Gjelaj, M., Buza, K., Shatri, K., & Zabeli, N. (2020). Digital technologies in early childhood: Attitudes and practices of parents and teachers in kosovo. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13111a

Gomez, D. R. (2018). Analyzing social construction of knowledge and social networks in online discussion forums in Spanish (Unpublished thesis). University of New Mexico, Mexico. Retrieved from https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/oils_etds/52

Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431. https://doi.org/10.2190/7mqv-x9uj-c7q3-nrag

Gunawardena, C. N., Flor, N. V, Gómez, D., & Sánchez, D. (2016). Analyzing social construction of knowledge online by employing interaction analysis, learning analytics, and social network analysis. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(3), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0317-y

Heggart, K. R., & Yoo, J. (2018). Getting the most from google classroom: A pedagogical framework for tertiary educators. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 140-153. https://dx.doi.org/10.14221/1jte.2018v43n3.9

Hou, H.-T., & Wu, S.-Y. (2011). Analyzing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of an online synchronous collaborative discussion instructional activity using an instant messaging tool: A case study. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1459–1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.012

Iftakhar, S. (2016). Google classroom: What works and how. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 3(1), 12–18. Retrieved from http://jesoc.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/KC3_35.pdf

Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (2007). Online social interchange, discord, and knowledge construction. Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 1-8. Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/download/137/412?inline=1

Khalil, Z. M. (2018). EFL students’ perceptions towards using Google Docs and Google Classroom as online collaborative tools in learning grammar. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 2(2), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.14744/alrj.2018.47955

Lee, J. S., & Dressman, M. (2018). When IDLE hands make an English workshop: Informal digital learning of English and language proficiency. Tesol Quarterly, 52(2), 435–445. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.422

Murphy, E., Rodríguez-Manzanares, M. A., & Barbour, M. (2011). Asynchronous and synchronous online teaching: Perspectives of Canadian high school distance education teachers: Asynchronous and synchronous. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 583–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01112.x

Mutiaraningrum, I., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2015). Online debate in argumentative writing course: potentials and challenges. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(4), 43-54. Retrieved from http://ijllnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_4_October_2015/6.pdf

Nor, N. F. M., Razak, N. A., & Aziz, J. (2010b). E-learning: Analysis of online discussion forums in promoting knowledge construction through collaborative learning. WSEAS Transactions on Communications, 9(1), 53-62.

Nugroho, A., Zamzami, M. R. A., & Ukhrowiyah, N. F. (2020). Language input, learning environment, and motivation of a successful EFL learner. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 10(1), 46–69. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v10i1.1511

Osipov, I. V., & Prasikova, A. Y. (2015). Real time collaborative platform for learning and teaching foreign languages. Human Computer Interaction, 15(1), 7-13. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.04155

Perveen, A. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous e-language learning: A case study of virtual university of Pakistan. Open Praxis, 8(1), 21-39. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1093436.pdf

Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., & Depaepe, F. (2019). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: Gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 23, 269-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z

Said, N. E. M., Yunus, M., Doring, L. K., Asmi, A., Aqilah, F., & Li, L. K. S. (2013). Blogging to enhance writing skills: A survey of students’ perception and attitude. Asian Social Science, 9(16), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n16p95

Salam, U. (2012.). The students' participation in WebCT: An activity theory perspective on online collaboration of knowledge construction. In Kelsey, S., & Amant, K. (Eds.), Computer-Mediated Communication: Issues and Approaches in Education (pp. 16). IGI Global. Retreived from https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/students-participation-webct/60025

Saritas, T. (2008). The construction of knowledge through social interaction via computer-mediated communication. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(1), 35-49. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ875087

Shaharanee, I. N. M., Jamil, J. M., & Rodzi, S. S. M. (2016). The application of Google classroom as a tool for teaching and learning. Journal of Telecomunication. Electronic and Computer Engineering, 8(10), 5-8. Retrieved from https://journal.utem.edu.my/index.php/jtec/article/view/1357

Spencer, D. H., & Hiltz, S. R. (2003). A field study of use of synchronous chat in online courses. In 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2003.1173742

UNESCO. (2020). Distance learning solutions. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse/solutions

Wang, Y., & Chen, N.-S. (2011). Online synchronous language learning: SLMS over the internet. Journal of Online Education, 3(3), 8-15. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/51073459.pdf

WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19—11 March 2020. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020

Yamagata-lynch, L. C. (2020). View of blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning, The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 15(2). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1778/2837

Young, T. P., Bailey, C. J., Guptill, M., Thorp, A. W., & Thomas, T. L. (2014). The flipped classroom: A modality for mixed asynchronous and synchronous learning in a residency program. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 15(7), 938-944. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2014.10.23515

Zhu, C. (2012). Student satisfaction, performance, and knowledge construction in online collaborative learning. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 127–136. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.15.1.127?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents




DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v10i2.1934

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 1483 times
PDF - 474 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 THE AUTHOR(S)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JEFL is published by Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya in collaboration with the Association of Teachers of English Linguistics, Literature and Education (ELITE Association) in Indonesia [MoU manuscript].

Editor and Administration Address:

Department of English Language EducationFaculty of Teacher Training and Education, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya, Jalan G. Obos Komplek Islamic Centre Palangka Raya, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia, Postal Code 73111, Email: jefl@iain-palangkaraya.ac.id, Website: http://e-journal.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/jefl

OAI address of JEFL is available at http://e-journal.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/jefl/oai



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

web
stats View My Stats


Flag Counter