High-stakes testing policy and English language teaching: Voices of the leftovers

Laser Romios; Ashadi Ashadi; Widyastuti Purbani

doi:10.23971/jefl.v10i2.2005

High-stakes testing policy and English language teaching: Voices of the leftovers

Laser Romios, Ashadi Ashadi, Widyastuti Purbani

Abstract

High-stakes testing has been controversial in many countries for several impacts and reasons surrounding its implementation. Teachers’ voices should be heard for well-rounded education policy. This study aims to investigate the voices of English teachers on the impacts of the national exam (NE) towards English language teaching at junior high schools (JHS) in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. It is a qualitative study involving three private JHSs and three state JHSs, chosen according to their NE-based ranks: low, mediocre, and high performing – for inclusive representation. The subjects are six English teachers from six JHSs. The data were collected through interviews and analyzed using the analysis model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldana, following the steps of data condensation, data categorization, data display, data interpretation, and conclusion drawing and verification. The findings show that NE leads to low order thinking skills, digresses from the goals of curriculum 2013, prioritizes only knowledge, focuses on English passive skills, induces favoritism between teachers, and disables teachers to vary their teaching strategies. Teachers’ involvement in education policy is necessary, and they are generally in favor of the NE abolishment plan. The implication of this study calls for implementing teachers' coping mechanism in transitioning from NE to the newly proposed assessment.

Keywords

high-stakes testing; teachers’ voices; English language teaching; education policy; national exam (NE)

Full Text:

PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 56713 times | PDF view : 483 times

References

Afflerbach, P. (2008). Meaningful assessment for struggling adolescent readers. In S. Lenski & J. Lewis (Eds.). Reading success for struggling adolescent learners (pp. 249-264). New York: Guilford.

Alexander, R. J. (2010). Children, their world, their education: Final report and recommendations of the Cambridge primary review. New York: Routledge.

Alexander, R. J. (2017). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (5th ed.). York: Logos.

Alhadza, A., & Zulkifli, M. (2017). National examination and the quality of education in Indonesia. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 4(21), 12. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.421.3613

Angrist, J., & Lavy, V. (2009). The effects of high stakes high school achievement awards: Evidence from a randomized trial. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1384–1414. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.4.1384

Antaranews. (2018, April 30). Pembocor soal UNBK SMP di Surabaya terungkap, begini modusnya [The leaker of the school-based test Junior High School in Surabaya was revealed, this is the mode]. Retrieved from https://www.antaranews.com/berita/706101/pembocor-soal-unbk-smp-di-surabaya-terungkap-begini-modusnya

Ashadi, A., & Rice, S. (2016). High stakes testing and teacher access to professional opportunities: Lessons from Indonesia. Journal of Education Policy, 31(6), 727–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1193901

Au, W. (2009). Social studies, social justice: W(h)ither the social studies in high-stakes testing?. Teaching Education Quarterly, 36(1), 43-58. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ851027.pdf

Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High‐stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2010.521261

Barksdale-Ladd, M. A., & Thomas, K. F. (2000). What’s at stake in high-stakes testing: Teachers and parents speak out. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(5), 384–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487100051005006

BBC Indonesia. (2017, April 14). Kasus bunuh diri siswa terkait ujian: USBN diminta ditinjau ulang [Student suicides related to exams: School-based test is requested to be reviewed]. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-39589093

Berliner, D. (2011). Rational responses to high stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2011.607151

Bishop, J. H. (1997). The effect of national standards and curriculum-based exams on achievement. The American Economic Review, 87(2), 260-264. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1142&context=cahrswp

Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input. New York: Pathfinder International.

Braun, A., Maguire, M., & Ball, S. J. (2010). Policy enactments in the UK secondary school: Examining policy, practice and school positioning. Journal of Education Policy, 25(4), 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680931003698544

Braun, A., Yamamoto, K., & Kirsch, I. (2011). An experimental study of the effects of monetary incentives on performance on the 12th-grade NAEP reading assessment. Teachers College Record, 113(11), 2309–2344. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ951108

BSNP. (2017). Kebijakan UN diubah untuk kuatkan tujuan dan fungsi UN [The NE policy was changed to strengthen the goals and functions of the NE]. Retrieved from https://bsnp-indonesia.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Buku-Saku-UN-6-Des-2017-Edit-21-Maret-2018.pdf

Celce-Murcia, M. (2007). Rethinking the role of communicative competence in language teaching. In E. A. Soler & M. P. S. Jordà (Eds.), Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning (pp. 41–57). Springer Netherlands.

Cochran-Smith, M. (2006). Policy, practice, and politics in teacher education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Cochran-Smith, M. (2003). Learning and unlearning: The education of teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00091-4

Coniam, D., & Falvey, P. (2018). High-stakes testing: The impact of the LPATE on English language teachers in Hong Kong. Singapore: Springer Nature.

Crawford, J., & Impara, J.C. (2001). Critical issues, current trends, and possible futures in quantitative methods. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 133–173). Washngton, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers’ College Press.

Deville, C., & Chalhoub-Deville, M. (2011). Accountability-assessment under no child left behind: Agenda, practice, and future. Language Testing, 28(3), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532211400876

Diamond, J. B. (2012). Practice: Partial recoupling and educational opportunity. Education and Urban Society, 44(2), 151-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124511431569

Dutro, E., & Selland, M. (2012). I like to read, but I know I’m not good at it: Children’s perspectives on high‐stakes testing in a high‐poverty school. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(3), 340–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00597.x

Effendi, T., & Suyudi, I. (2017). The impacts of English national examination in Indonesia. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 82, 236-239. Retrieved from https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/conaplin-16/25874167

Franzak, J. K. (2004). Constructing struggling readers: Policies and experiences of eighth-grade readers. In J. Worthy, B., Maloch, J., Hoffman, D., Schallert & C. Fairbanks (Eds). 53rd Yearbook of The National Reading Conference. (pp. 189-205). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.

Fulcher, G. (2003). Testing second language speaking. London: Longman/Pearson Education.

Guthrie, J. T. (2002). Preparing students for high-stakes test taking in reading. In A.E. Farstup & S.J. Samuels (Eds.). What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 370–389). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.

Harris, P., Smith, B. M., & Harris, J. (2011). The myths of standardized tests. Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.

Hartaty, W. (2017). The impacts of the 2015 national examination policy in Indonesia on English language teaching. International Seminar on English Language and Teaching, 5, 355-358. Retrieved from http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/selt/article/view/8027/6129

Indrawati, T. (2018). Washback of English national examination on the teaching learning process. Research on English Language Teaching in Indonesia, 6(3), 60-68. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/230779373.pdf

Jones, B. D., & Hargrove,T. (2003). The unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Kempf, A. (2016). The pedagogy of standardized testing: The radical impacts of educational standardization in the US and Canada. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kurniasari, N. (2016). Hubungan antara intensitas zikir dengan kecemasan menjelang Ujian Nasional pada siswa SMA di MAN 1 Yogyakarta [The relationship between the intensity of remembrance with anxiety before the National Examination on high school students in MAN 1 Yogyakarta] (Unpublished Thesis). UIN Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta, Indonesia]. Retrieved from http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/23465/1/09710052_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf

Lengkanawati, N.S. (2005). EFL teacher’s competence in the context of English curriculum 2004: Implications for EFL teacher education. TEFLIN Journal, 16(1), 79–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v16i1/79-92

Lichtman, M. (2010). Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Maisaroh, E. N., & Falah, F. (2011). Religiusitas dan kecemasan menghadapi ujian nasional (UN) pada siswa Madrasah Aliyah [Religiosity and anxiety facing national exams on Madrasah Aliyah students]. Proyeksi, 6(2), 78-88. https://doi.org/10.30659/p.6.2.78-88

Makarim, N. (2019a). Nadiem: Sederhanakan aturan standar pendidikan [Nadiem: Simplify the rules of education standards]. BSNP. Retrieved from https://bsnp-indonesia.org/2019/12/nadiem-sederhanakan-aturan-standar-pendidikan/

Makarim, N. (2019b). PPDB 2020 tetap sistem zonasi, kuota jalur prestasi ditambah [New student recruitment 2020 remains using the zonation system, the achievement-based quota is added]. BSNP. Retrieved from https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2019/12/ppdb-2020-tetap-sistem-zonasi-kuota-jalur-prestasi-ditambah

Merdeka. (2013, May 29). Gita Saraswati: Siswi berprestasi di Medan tak lulus UN [Gita Saraswati: A student who excelled in Medan did not pass the National Examination]. Retrieved from https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/gita-saraswati-siswi-berprestasi-di-medan-tak-lulus-un.html

Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco: CA: Jossey-Bass.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. A method sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v7i1.571

Mukminin, A., Haryanto, E., Makmur, Failasofah, Fajaryani, N., Thabran, Y., & Hamzah, S. A. N. (2013). The achievement ideology and top-down national standardized exam policy in Indonesia: Voices from local English teachers. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 4(4) 19-38. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.03900

Mustajib. (2017). The impact of national examination on students’ motivation and teachers’ professionalism at English class in Mataram municipality year 2016. The Indonesian Journal of Language and Language Teaching, 2, 1–13. Retrieved from http://ijolt.unram.ac.id/index.php/ijolt/article/view/20/18

Nahdia, K., & Trisnati, N. (2019). Examining washback of national examination: EFL teachers and students’ perceptions. UNNES International Conference on English Language Teaching, Literature, and Translation, 188, 273-277. https://doi.org/10.2991/eltlt-18.2019.54

Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2007). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Nuriana, D. (2019). Kendala guru dalam memberikan penilaian sikap siswa pada proses pembelajaran berdasarkan kurikulum 2013 [Teacher's constraints in providing an assessment of student attitudes in the learning process based on the 2013 curriculum]. Madrosatuna: Journal of Islamic Elementary School, 2(2), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.21070/madrosatuna.v2i2.1970

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2015 [Ministry of Education and Culture Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 year 2015]. Retrieved from https://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/atur/bsnp/un/201 5/Permendikbud5-2015KriteriaKelulusanPesertaDidikUN.pdf

Putra, K.A. (2012). Mengurai benang kusut pembelajaran bahasa Inggris [Unravel the tangles of English learning]. Radar Lampung Newspaper, pp. 7.

Republika. (2019, January 16). Banyak berubahkah PPDB 2019? [Are there many changes in the New Student Recruitment 2019?] Retrieved from https://www.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/news-analysis/19/01/16/plenbt440-banyak-berubahkah-ppdb-2019

Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: Forward, central, and backward design. RELC Journal, 44(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212473293

Roderick, M., & Engel, M. (2001). The grasshopper and the ant: Motivational responses of low-achieving students to high-stakes testing. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(3), 197–227. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023003197

Saldaña, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. New York: Oxford University Press.

Saukah, A., & Cahyono, A. E. (2015). National exam in Indonesia and its implications to the teaching and learning of English. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(2), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v19i2.5583

Setiyadi, B. (2009). The challenges of the teaching of English in Indonesia. A paper presented at professorship inauguration. University of Bandar Lampung, Indonesia.

Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Spring, J. (2004). American education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. New York: Routledge.

Sundayana, W., Meekaeo, P., Purnawarman, P., & Sukyadi, D. (2018). Washback of English national exams at ninth-grade level in Thailand and Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 167-176. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i1.11478

The Jakarta Post. (2019, December 12). Listen up, students: Nadiem wants to do away with national exam. Retrieved from https://www.thejakartapost.com /news/2019/12/12/listen-up-students-nadiem-wants-to-do-away-with-national-exam.html

Thomas, R.M. (2005). High-stakes testing: Coping with collateral damage. New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional [Republic of Indonesia's Constitution Number 20 Year 2003 about National Education System]. Retrieved from http://simkeu.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/peraturan1/8-uu-undang-undang/12-uu-no-20-tahun-2003-tentang-sistem-pendidikan-nasional

Wepner, S. B. (2006). Teaching gone amok: Leave no teacher candidate behind. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(1), 135-149. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ795202.pdf

Yulia, Y. (2014). An evaluation of English language teaching programs in Indonesian Junior High Schools in Yogyakarta province (Unpublished Ph.D thesis). RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from http://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/eserv/rmit:160956/Yulia.pdf

Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B., M. (2009). Unstructured interviews. In B. M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 222-231). London: Libraries Unlimited.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v10i2.2005