Investigating conference feedback in Cambodian EFL class: students’ writing accuracy improvement and their views of the feedback

Chan Hum


Research of conference feedback on EFL students' writing accuracy is a vital issue; however, it has never been conducted in Cambodia. This study was carried out to fill this void by investigating conference feedback to improve students' writing accuracy in four categories: semantic, grammatical, mechanic, and lexical features. It also explored the students' perceptions of the feedback in the context of EFL writing class. One class, with twelve students, from 18 to 25 years of age, with a ratio of 8:4 women: men, was purposively chosen for the study which was designed in two cycles, each with eight steps. Data were collected from the writing tests, writing assignments, students' self-evaluation survey, and focus-group discussions. Findings revealed that conference feedback had improved students' writing skills by allowing them to use correct grammar and expressions. The feedback has also developed students' engagement in the writing process. It also proposed a pedagogical implication that effective feedback through a conference approach depends to a great extent on the knowledge and experience of the teacher, classroom resources, and interactions between the teacher and the student.


conference feedback; expression of precise meanings; grammatical errors; writing accuracy

Full Text:


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 482 times | PDF view : 138 times


Al Noursi, O. (2014). Don’t get it right, just get it written: making feedback work. In A. Al-Mahrooqi, R., Thakur, V. S., Roscoe (Ed.), Methodologies for Effective Writing Instruction in EFL and ESL Classrooms (pp. 209–229). IGI Global.

Alvira, R. (2016). The Impact of oral and written feedback on EFL writers with the use of screencasts. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 18(2), 79.

Anast-May, L., Dana, P., Rebecca, S., & Howell, A. (2011). Teacher conferencing and feedback: necessary but missing! International Journal of Educational Leadership, 6(2), 1–7.

Angel, M., Lucia, N., Garcia, M., & Manuel, J. (2017). Improving English language learners’ academic writing: a multi-strategy approach to a multi-dimemsional challenge. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 14(14), 49–67. Retrieved from

Atai, M. R., & Alipour, M. (2012). The effect of the combination of small-group conferencing and portfolio procedure on EFL students’ writing accuracy. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 97–112.

Azar, B. S. (2003). English grammar (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.

Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 191–205.

Blass, L., & Hartmann, P. (2006). Quest 3 Listening and speaking student book (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Boggs, J. A. (2019). Effects of teacher-scaffolded and self-scaffolded corrective feedback compared to direct corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy in English L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 46.

Burns, A. (2005). Action research: an evolving paradigm? Language Teaching, 38(2), 57–74.

Burns, A. (2009). Action research in second language teacher. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 289–297). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Burns, A. (2011). Action research in the field of second language teaching and learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 226–243). Abingdon: Routledge.

Burns, A. (2019). Action research in English language teaching: contributions and recent developments. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 1–15). Switzerland: Springer.

Butler, L. (2014). Longman academic writing Series: Sentences to paragraphs. New York: Pearson Education Limited.

Cavkaytar, S., & Yasar, S. (2010). Using writing process in teaching composition skills: an action research. International Conference “ICT for Language Learning” 3rd Ed. Retrieved from

Chan, H. (2018). Cambodian EFL students’ investment in learning English: perspectives and practices. Teflin Journal, 29(1), 45–71.

Chan, H., & Sotith, S. (2016). Impacts of the COERR writing project on Cambodian students’ attitudes and writing performance. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 4(3), 133-140.

Chan, V. (2015). Integrating social awareness through reading and writing: a classroom action research. Language Education in Asia, 5(2), 216–227.

Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267–296.

Chea, S., & Shumow, L. (2015). The relationships among writing self-efficacy, writing goal orientation, and writing achievement. Language Education in Asia, 5(2), 253–269.

Clouse, B. . (2012). The student writer. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Demirel, E., & Enginarlar, H. (2016). Effects of combined peer-teacher feedback on second langauge writing development. Journal of Education, 31(4), 657–675.

Eckstein, G. (2013). Implementing and evaluating a writing conference program for international L2 writers across language proficiency levels. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 231–239.

Ekmekci, E. (2015). L1 use in individual conferencing and its effects on EFL students’ writing performances. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 1, 723–733.

Ferreira, A., Moore, J. D., & Mellish, C. (2007). A study of feedback strategies in foreign language classrooms and tutorials with implications for intelligent computer-assisted language learning systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 17(4), 389–422. Retrieved from

Ferris, D. (2007). Preparing teachers to respond to student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 165–193.

Hammerly, H. (1994). Fluency and accuracy: Toward balance in langauge teaching and learning. Adelaide: Miltilingual Matters.

Hartmann, P., & Blass, L. (2006). Quest 3 Reading and writing student book (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

He, X. (2015). An action research on improving non-English majors’ English writing by basic sentence pattern translation drills. English Language Teaching, 9(1), 142-147.

Ho, P. V. P., Ly, H. H., & Thien, N. M. (2020). The incorporation of quality peer feedback into writing revision. Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 45–59. Retrieved from

Huisman, B., Saab, N., van den Broek, P., & van Driel, J. (2019). The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: a meta-analysis. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 863–880.

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101.

Kaplan, R. (1966). Cultural thought patterns. Language Learning, 16(1–2), 1–20.

Kim, S.-Y. (2012). Measuring linguistic accuracy in an EFL writing class: an electronic communication channel. Linguistic Research, 29(3), 665–688.

Klimova, B. (2015). The role of feedback in EFL classes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 172–177.

Koshy, V. (2005). Action research for improving practice: A practical guide. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

Lahuerta, A. C. (2018). Study of accuracy and grammatical complexity in EFL writing. International Journal of English Studies, 18(1), 71–89.

Lerner, N. (2005). The teacher-student writing conference and the desire for intimacy. College English, 68(2), 187–208.

Nosratinia, M., & Nikpanjeh, N. (2015). Promoting foreign language learners’ writing: comparing the impact of oral conferencing and collaborative writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(11), 2218–2229.

Nurie, Y. (2020). Graduate students’ perceived needs and preferences for supervisor written feedback for thesis writing. Journal of Language and Education, 6(4), 153–170.

Polio, C. (1997). Measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Language Learning, 47(1), 101–143.

Polio, C., Fleck, C., & Leder, N. (1998). “If i only had more time:” ESL learners’ changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(1), 43–68.

Polio, C., & Shea, M. C. (2014). An investigation into current measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 10–27.

Richards, J. C. (1971). A non-contrastive approach to error analysis. English Language Teaching, 2(5), 204-21 9.

Sapkota, A. (2013). Developing students’ writing skill through peer and teacher correction: an action research. Journal of NELTA, 17(1–2), 70–82.

Shirotha, F. B. (2016). The effect of indirect written corrective feedback on students’ writing accuracy. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 6(2), 101–118.

Sotoudehnama, E., & Pilehvari, A. (2016). The impact of peer review on EFL learners’ writing proficiency: global and local aspects. Porta Linguarum, 25, 35–47. Retrieved from

Sou, B. (2010). Using directive and facilative feedback to improve student writing: a case study of a higher education setting in Cambodia. Language Education in Asia, 1(1), 23–47.

Touchie, H. (1986). Second language learning errors: their types, causes, and treatment. JALT Journal, 8(1), 75–80. Retrieved from

Wang, W. (2016). Peer feedback in Chinese college English writing class: using action research to promote students’ English writing. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(5), 958–966.

Yamalee, E., & Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2019). Effects of integrated feedback on academic writing achievement. Arab World English Journal, 10(3), 250–270.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 THE AUTHOR(S)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal on English as a Foreign Language is published by Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya in collaboration with the Association of Teachers of English Linguistics, Literature and Education (ELITE Association) in Indonesia [MoU manuscript].

Editor and Administration Address:

Department of English Language EducationFaculty of Teacher Training and Education, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya, Jalan G. Obos Komplek Islamic Centre Palangka Raya, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia, Postal Code 73111, Email:, Website:

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

stats View My Stats

Flag Counter