Augmenting English public speaking skill through peer evaluation: a case study in Toastmaster International Club

Lailatul Rifah, Fardini Sabilah


Having peers to give public speaking feedback is always feasible to measure the learners’ performance. However, learners are unwilling to share their feedback in the evaluation due to hesitance. This research investigates the kind of peer evaluation elements that the Toastmaster evaluator used to evaluate the speakers and how the they interpret the evaluation given by their peers. An in-depth interview was used to analyze about the elements of peer evaluation and the speakers’ feedback towards peer evaluation. Snowballing technique was chosen to select the research subjects. Three research subjects, as the members of Toastmaster International (TMI) in Malang and Surabaya, Indonesia claimed that the elements of evaluation used in TMI increased the ability of public speaking. The assessment aspects were divided into three factors: the script, seen, and spoken. Meanwhile, other crucial evaluation elements in public speaking include the grammatical aspect and proper words instead of filler words. This research found that the TMI speakers felt very satisfied with the implementation of peer evaluation due to its effect on increasing confidence during performing public speaking. It can be implied that peer evaluation element can effectively be used to measure oral communication skills from peer’s point of view in TMI.


evaluation elements; peer evaluation; Toastmaster International Club

Full Text:


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 437 times | PDF view : 124 times


Alzaid, J. M. (2017). The effect of peer assessment on the evaluation process of Students. International Education Studies, 10(6), 159-173.

Andika, A., & Mitsalina, E. (2020). Analysis of variety of learning difficulties in Indonesian language education students on English language courses at university of Ma’arif NU Kebumen. ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal), 11(1), 10–15.

Anggini, S. D., & Arjulayana, A.-. (2021). Analysis student’s speaking performance as an academic speaker’s practice. Globish: An English-Indonesian Journal for English, Education, and Culture, 10(1), 58-71.

Buquiran, E. S. (2014). Factors affecting members’ retention in Toastmasters International. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 182-200.

Chang, C.-C., Tseng, K.-H., Chou, P.-N., & Chen, Y.-H. (2011). Reliability and validity of web-based portfolio peer assessment: a case study for a senior high school’s students taking computer course. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1306–1316.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and reserach design: choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). California: Sage Publications, Inc.

Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2015). Structuring peer assessment: comparing the impact of the degree of structure on peer feedback content. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 315–325.

Gielen, S., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., Struyven, K., & Smeets, S. (2011). Goals of peer assessment and their associated quality concepts. Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 719–735.

Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal, 204(6), 291–295.

Glyn,T., Dona, M., & Pleasants, K. (2011). Using self- and peer-assessment to enhance students’ future-learning in higher education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 8(1), 17-29.

Inayati, N., Nurbatra, L. H., & Maro, R. K. (2015). Implementation of 2015 mentoring program in english department of Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan (JINOP), 3(2), 609–624.

James, E. (2005). Student assessment from a psychological perspective. SAGE Journals, 3(2), 114–121.

Kearney, S., Perkins, T., & Kennedy-Clark, S. (2015). Using self- and peer-assessments for summative purposes: analysing the relative validity of the AASL (authentic assessment for sustainable learning) model. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 1–14.

Kerby, D., & Romine, J. (2009). Develop oral presentation skills through accounting curriculum design and course-embedded assessment. Journal of Education for Business, 85(3), 172–179.

Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2010). Peer assessment as collaborative learning: a cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 344–348.

Landry, A., Jacobs, S., & Newton, G. (2014). Effective use of peer assessment in a graduate level writing assignment: a case study. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(1), 38-51.

Laserna, C. M., Seih, Y. T., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2014). Um. . who like says you know: filler word use as a function of age, gender, and personality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(3), 328–338.

Lladó, A., P., Soley, L. F., Sansbelló, R. M. F., Pujolras, G. A., Planella, J. P., Roura-Pascual, N., Martínez, J. J. S., & Moreno, L. M. (2014). Student perceptions of peer assessment: an interdisciplinary study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(5), 592–610.

Lutze-Mann, L. (2015). Peer assessment of assignment drafts: about peer assessment. assessment toolkit, student peer assessment. UNSW.

MacArthur, F. (2010). Metaphorical competence in EFL: where are we and where should we be going? a view from the language classroom. AILA Review, 23(1), 155–173.

Montero, R. L., & ALvarado, J. S. (2019). Improving English oral and public speaking skills in the classroom. Revista De Lenguas Modernas, 30, 143–161.

Naderifar, M., Goli, H., & Ghaljaie, F. (2017). Snowball sampling: a purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 14(3). 1-4.

Nawi, R. A., Yasin, B., & Champion, I. C. R. (2015). Impromptu: great impromptu speaking is never just impromptu. Studies in English Language and Education, 2(2), 144-157.

Nordin, S. M., & Shaari, Z. H. (2017). Implementing the Toastmasters tradition in the L2 classroom. The English Teacher, XXXIV(2001), 60–66.

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2014). Essentials of nursing research seventh edition appraising evidence for nursing practice. In Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Raja, F. U. (2017). Anxiety Level in students of public speaking: causes and remedies. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 4(1), 94-109.

Smedley, R. C. (2014). District 7 Toastmasters history. Oregon: Multnomah.

Talja, S. (1999). Analyzing qualitative interview data. Library & Information Science Research, 21(4), 459–477.

Usman, B., Muslim, A., Champion, I. C. R., & Samad, I. A. (2018). Progressive peer evaluation: important but absent in EFL speaking classes. Studies in English Language and Education, 5(2), 308–327.

Yee, K. M., Jafre, M., & Abidin, Z. (2014). The use of public speaking in motivating esl learners to overcome speech anxiety. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL, 2(11), 127–135. Retrieved from

Zakian, M., Moradan, A., & Naghibi, S. E. (2012). The relationship between self-, peer-, and teacher-assessments of EFL learners’ speaking. World J Arts, Languages, and Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–5.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 437 times
PDF - 124 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2022 THE AUTHOR(S)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JEFL is published by Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya in collaboration with the Association of Teachers of English Linguistics, Literature and Education (ELITE Association) in Indonesia [MoU manuscript].

Editor and Administration Address:

Department of English Language EducationFaculty of Teacher Training and Education, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya, Jalan G. Obos Komplek Islamic Centre Palangka Raya, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia, Postal Code 73111, Email:, Website:

OAI address of JEFL is available at

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

stats View My Stats

Flag Counter