Augmenting English public speaking skill through peer evaluation: a case study in Toastmaster International Club

Lailatul Rifah, Fardini Sabilah

Abstract


Having peers to give public speaking feedback is always feasible to measure the learners’ performance. However, learners are unwilling to share their feedback in the evaluation due to hesitance. This research investigates the kind of peer evaluation elements that the Toastmaster evaluator used to evaluate the speakers and how the they interpret the evaluation given by their peers. An in-depth interview was used to analyze about the elements of peer evaluation and the speakers’ feedback towards peer evaluation. Snowballing technique was chosen to select the research subjects. Three research subjects, as the members of Toastmaster International (TMI) in Malang and Surabaya, Indonesia claimed that the elements of evaluation used in TMI increased the ability of public speaking. The assessment aspects were divided into three factors: the script, seen, and spoken. Meanwhile, other crucial evaluation elements in public speaking include the grammatical aspect and proper words instead of filler words. This research found that the TMI speakers felt very satisfied with the implementation of peer evaluation due to its effect on increasing confidence during performing public speaking. It can be implied that peer evaluation element can effectively be used to measure oral communication skills from peer’s point of view in TMI.


Keywords


evaluation elements; peer evaluation; Toastmaster International Club

Full Text:

PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 437 times | PDF view : 124 times

References


Alzaid, J. M. (2017). The effect of peer assessment on the evaluation process of Students. International Education Studies, 10(6), 159-173. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n6p159

Andika, A., & Mitsalina, E. (2020). Analysis of variety of learning difficulties in Indonesian language education students on English language courses at university of Ma’arif NU Kebumen. ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal), 11(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v11i1.6064

Anggini, S. D., & Arjulayana, A.-. (2021). Analysis student’s speaking performance as an academic speaker’s practice. Globish: An English-Indonesian Journal for English, Education, and Culture, 10(1), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.31000/globish.v10i1.3943

Buquiran, E. S. (2014). Factors affecting members’ retention in Toastmasters International. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 182-200.

Chang, C.-C., Tseng, K.-H., Chou, P.-N., & Chen, Y.-H. (2011). Reliability and validity of web-based portfolio peer assessment: a case study for a senior high school’s students taking computer course. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1306–1316. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.014

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and reserach design: choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). California: Sage Publications, Inc.

Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2015). Structuring peer assessment: comparing the impact of the degree of structure on peer feedback content. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.019

Gielen, S., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., Struyven, K., & Smeets, S. (2011). Goals of peer assessment and their associated quality concepts. Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 719–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003759037

Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal, 204(6), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.192

Glyn,T., Dona, M., & Pleasants, K. (2011). Using self- and peer-assessment to enhance students’ future-learning in higher education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 8(1), 17-29.

Inayati, N., Nurbatra, L. H., & Maro, R. K. (2015). Implementation of 2015 mentoring program in english department of Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan (JINOP), 3(2), 609–624.

James, E. (2005). Student assessment from a psychological perspective. SAGE Journals, 3(2), 114–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2003.3.2.114

Kearney, S., Perkins, T., & Kennedy-Clark, S. (2015). Using self- and peer-assessments for summative purposes: analysing the relative validity of the AASL (authentic assessment for sustainable learning) model. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1039484

Kerby, D., & Romine, J. (2009). Develop oral presentation skills through accounting curriculum design and course-embedded assessment. Journal of Education for Business, 85(3), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320903252389

Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2010). Peer assessment as collaborative learning: a cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 344–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.005

Landry, A., Jacobs, S., & Newton, G. (2014). Effective use of peer assessment in a graduate level writing assignment: a case study. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(1), 38-51. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v4n1p38

Laserna, C. M., Seih, Y. T., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2014). Um. . who like says you know: filler word use as a function of age, gender, and personality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(3), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14526993

Lladó, A., P., Soley, L. F., Sansbelló, R. M. F., Pujolras, G. A., Planella, J. P., Roura-Pascual, N., Martínez, J. J. S., & Moreno, L. M. (2014). Student perceptions of peer assessment: an interdisciplinary study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(5), 592–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.860077

Lutze-Mann, L. (2015). Peer assessment of assignment drafts: about peer assessment. assessment toolkit, student peer assessment. UNSW.

MacArthur, F. (2010). Metaphorical competence in EFL: where are we and where should we be going? a view from the language classroom. AILA Review, 23(1), 155–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.23.09mac

Montero, R. L., & ALvarado, J. S. (2019). Improving English oral and public speaking skills in the classroom. Revista De Lenguas Modernas, 30, 143–161.

Naderifar, M., Goli, H., & Ghaljaie, F. (2017). Snowball sampling: a purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 14(3). 1-4. https://doi.org/10.5812/sdme.67670

Nawi, R. A., Yasin, B., & Champion, I. C. R. (2015). Impromptu: great impromptu speaking is never just impromptu. Studies in English Language and Education, 2(2), 144-157. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v2i2.2697

Nordin, S. M., & Shaari, Z. H. (2017). Implementing the Toastmasters tradition in the L2 classroom. The English Teacher, XXXIV(2001), 60–66.

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2014). Essentials of nursing research seventh edition appraising evidence for nursing practice. In Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Raja, F. U. (2017). Anxiety Level in students of public speaking: causes and remedies. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 4(1), 94-109. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v4i1.1001

Smedley, R. C. (2014). District 7 Toastmasters history. Oregon: Multnomah.

Talja, S. (1999). Analyzing qualitative interview data. Library & Information Science Research, 21(4), 459–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0740-8188(99)00024-9

Usman, B., Muslim, A., Champion, I. C. R., & Samad, I. A. (2018). Progressive peer evaluation: important but absent in EFL speaking classes. Studies in English Language and Education, 5(2), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v5i2.11115

Yee, K. M., Jafre, M., & Abidin, Z. (2014). The use of public speaking in motivating esl learners to overcome speech anxiety. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL, 2(11), 127–135. Retrieved from https://www.arcjournals.org/pdfs/ijsell/v2-i11/16.pdf

Zakian, M., Moradan, A., & Naghibi, S. E. (2012). The relationship between self-, peer-, and teacher-assessments of EFL learners’ speaking. World J Arts, Languages, and Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–5.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v12i1.3113

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 437 times
PDF - 124 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 THE AUTHOR(S)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JEFL is published by Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya in collaboration with the Association of Teachers of English Linguistics, Literature and Education (ELITE Association) in Indonesia [MoU manuscript].

Editor and Administration Address:

Department of English Language EducationFaculty of Teacher Training and Education, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya, Jalan G. Obos Komplek Islamic Centre Palangka Raya, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia, Postal Code 73111, Email: jefl@iain-palangkaraya.ac.id, Website: http://e-journal.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/jefl

OAI address of JEFL is available at http://e-journal.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/jefl/oai



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

web
stats View My Stats


Flag Counter