EFL teacher educators’ experiences in teaching critical reading: evidence from Indonesia

Muhammad Yunus, M. Faruq Ubaidillah


While extensive studies have explored issues of teaching critical reading in English as a foreign language (EFL) classes, there is a paucity of research that examines teacher educators’ conceptions of teaching critical reading in the EFL contexts. To fill the gap, this phenomenological study probes into EFL teacher educators’ experiences in teaching critical reading. It specifically looks at teacher educators’ conceptions of teaching critical reading and how their teaching practices contribute to the development of students’ critical reading skills. Data were generated through in-depth interviews with nine teacher educators in a private university in Malang, Indonesia. Findings suggest that the teacher educators’ conceptions of teaching critical reading, as geared by their lived experiences, involve basic conceptions of teaching critical reading, teaching critical reading from a philosophical lens, and critical thinking empowerment in reading classes. The study also documents that teaching critical reading encompasses higher order thinking skills enacted in the process of reading. Practically, the study’s findings call for the enactment of pedagogic trainings for teacher educators in order to construe their basic tenets of teaching critical reading, the philosophies behind such a teaching practice, and the empowered learning activities in the reading classes.


critical reading; EFL student; ELT; teacher educator experience; teacher educator conception

Full Text:


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 1209 times | PDF view : 835 times


Asmari, A. Al, & Javid, C. Z. (2018). Role of content schema in reading comprehension among Saudi EFL students: EFL teachers’ perspective and use of appropriate classroom strategies. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(4), 96-105. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n4p96

Awada, G., & Plana, M. G. C. (2018). Multiple strategies approach and EFL reading comprehension of learners with dyslexia: teachers’ perceptions. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11332a

Azizi, M., & Kralik, R. (2020). Incorporating mindfulness into EFL literature courses to foster critical reading ability. Education and Self Development, 15(4), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd15.4.06

Baddeley, A. D., & Lewis, V. J. (1981). Inner active processes in reading: The inner voice, the inner ear and the inner eye. ln A. M. Lesgold and C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp, 107-129).

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Britt, M. A. (2009). Trust matters: Examining the role of source evaluation in students’ construction of meaning within and across multiple texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.44.1.1

Brown, A. L. (2010). Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters. London: Routledge.

Chak, M. C. (2020). What does text selection in the HKDSE reading comprehension paper say about the exam? Journal of Asia TEFL, 17(4), 1392-1404 https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2020.

Chin, M.-H. (2019). Can L2 less-proficient adult learners become skilled readers?, 31(1), 1-10. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.

Chou, M. H. (2021). Using literature circles to teach graded readers in English: an investigation into reading performance and strategy use, Online First, 1-20. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.1885412

Colombo, L., & Prior, M. (2016). How do faculty conceptions on reading, writing and their role in the teaching of academic literacies influence their inclusive attitude. Ilha Do Desterro, 69(3), 115-124. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2016v69n3p115

Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. New York: Sage Publication.

Creswell, J. C. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (the 2nd ed.). New York: Sage Publication.

Din, M. (2020). Evaluating university students’ critical thinking ability as reflected in their critical reading skill: a study at bachelor level in Pakistan. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100627

Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239-264. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061002239

Elleman, A. M., & Oslund, E. L. (2019). Reading comprehension research: implications for practice and policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218816339

Erlina, D., Mayuni, I., & Akhadiah, S. (2016). Whole language-based English reading materials. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(3), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.3p.46

Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Fatameh, K., & Kazemian, S. M. (2016). The effect of dynamic assessment on Iranian EFL students’ critical reading performance. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 41(2), 115-123.

Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2015). Teacher modeling using complex informational texts. The Reading Teacher, 69(1), 63-69. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1428

Halai, N. (2015). Making use of bilingual interview data: some experiences from the field. The Qualitative Report, 12(3), 344-355. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1621

Hamiddin, & Saukah, A. (2020). Investigating metacognitive knowledge in reading comprehension: the case of Indonesian undergraduate students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 608-615. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i3.23211

Islam, M., & Eltilib, H. (2020). Reading aloud to first grade students: a case study of Saudi Arabia. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1832646

Jian, Y. C. (2018). Reading instructions influence cognitive processes of illustrated text reading not subject perception: an eye-tracking study. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(1), 22-37. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02263

Jiménez, J. E., Siegel, L., O’Shanahan, I., & Ford, L. (2009). The relative roles of IQ and cognitive processes in reading disability. Educational Psychology, 29(1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410802459226

Jung, J. (2020). The impact of glossing and reading activity manipulation on learning of L2 lexico-grammatical and lexical items. Language Teaching Research, Online First. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820911198

Karademir, E., & Ulucinar, U. (2016). Examining the relationship between middle school students’ critical reading skills, science literacy skills and attitudes: a structural equation modeling. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 3(1), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.275669

Kavani, R., & Amjadiparvar, A. (2018). The effect of strategy-based instruction on motivation, self-regulated learning, and reading comprehension ability of Iranian EFL learning. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1556196

Khonamri, F., & Sana’ati, M. K. (2014). The impacts of dynamic assessment and CALL on critical reading: an interventionist approach. Procedia: Journal of social and Behavioral Sciences. [Electronic version]. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S1877042814025993.

Kung, F. W. (2019). Teaching second language reading comprehension: the effects of classroom materials and reading strategy use. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2017.1364252

Lantolf, J. P. (2007). Sociocultural source of thinking and its relevance for second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 31-33.

Léger, P. D., & Cameron, C. A. (2013). Meaning construction in early oral reading. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 27(4), 454-471. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2013.823898

Lian, A., & Pertiwi, W. H. S. (2017). Theorising for innovation: implications for English language teacher education. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 17(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2017-1703-01

Macalister, J. (2014). Teaching reading: research into practice. Language Teaching, 47(3), 387-397. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144481400007X

Mardiha, S. M., & Alibakhshi, G. (2020). Teachers’ personal espistemological beliefs and their conceptions of teaching and learning: a correlational study. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1763230. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1763230

Mosie, K. (2020). A phenomenological study of English teachers’ experiences, beliefs, and self-efficacy regarding 1:1 iPad technology. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences.

Ng, C. (2018). Using student voice to promote reading engagement for economically disadvantaged students. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(4), 700-715. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12249

Nurkamto, J., Drajati, N. A., Ngadiso, & Karlina, Y. (2021). Teachers’ beliefs and practices in teaching reading at Islamic secondary schools in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(3), 667-676. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i3.31753

Okkinga, M., van Steensel, R., van Gelderen, A. J. S., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2018). Effects of reciprocal teaching on reading comprehension of low-achieving adolescents: the importance of specific teacher skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(1), 20-41.

Par, L. (2020). The relationship between reading strategies and reading achievement of the EFL students. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 223-238. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13216a

Park, A. Y. (2020). A comparison of the impact of extensive and intensive reading approaches on the reading attitudes of secondary EFL learners. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 337-358. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.2.6

Phajane, M. H. (2014). Traditional method of teaching reading. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(15), 212-218, https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n15p212

Poulson, L., & Wallace, M. (Eds.). (2011). Learning to read critically in teaching and learning. London: Sage Publication. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857024466

Roohani, A., & Asiabani, S. (2015). Effects of self-regulated strategy development on EFL learners’ reading comprehension and metacognition. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 15(3), 31-49.

Rosenblatt, L. M. (1993). The transactional theory: against dualisms. College English. https://doi.org/10.2307/378648.

Sana'ati, M.K., Khonamri, F., Azizi, M., & Molana, K. (2019). Dynamic assessment in developing EFL learners’ depth of vocabulary knowledge through criticalreading. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 44(2), 20–29.

St Clair-Thompson, H., Graham, A., & Marsham, S. (2018). Exploring the reading practices of undergraduate students. Education Inquiry, 9(3), 284-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2017.1380487

Sutherland, A., & Incera, S. (2021). Critical reading: what do faculty think students should do? Journal of College Reading and Learning, Online First. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2021.1887777

Taylor, J. S. H., Davis, M. H., & Rastle, K. (2017). Comparing and validating methods of reading instruction using behavioural and neural findings in an artificial orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(6), 826-858. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000301

Tiffin-Richards, S. P., & Schroeder, S. (2015). The component processes of reading comprehension in adolescents. Learning and Individual Differences, 4, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.07.016

van den Broek, P. (2012). Individual and developmen-tal differences in reading comprehension: assessing cognitive processes and outcomes. In J. P. Sabatini, E. R. Albro, & T. O’ Reilly (Eds.), Measuring up: Advances in how we assess reading ability (pp.39–58). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Little field Education.

Villalonga-Penna, M. M. (2020). Reading at high school and reading at first year psychology: more and less experienced teachers’ perspectives. Revista Colombiana de Educacion, 1(80), 53-74. https://doi.org/10.17227/RCE.NUM80-9591

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: development of higher psychological processes. New York: Harvard University Press.

Wallace, C. (2003). Critical reading in language education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Widodo, H. P. (2009). Methodological considerations in interview data transcription. International Journal of Innovation in English Language Teaching and Research, 3(1), 101-107.

Zaman, S., Asghar, S., & Asghar, Z. &. (2019). Evaluation of teaching reading strategies used by early grade teachers. Journal of Early Childhood Care and Education, 3(1), 27-42.

Žolgar-Jerkovic, I., Jenko, N., & Lipec-Stopar, M. (2018). Affective factors and reading achievement in different groups of readers. International Journal of Special Education, 33(1), 201-211.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v11i2.3133


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 THE AUTHOR(S)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JEFL is published by Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya in collaboration with the Association of Teachers of English Linguistics, Literature and Education (ELITE Association) in Indonesia [MoU manuscript].

Editor and Administration Address:

Department of English Language EducationFaculty of Teacher Training and Education, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya, Jalan G. Obos Komplek Islamic Centre Palangka Raya, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia, Postal Code 73111, Email: [email protected], Website: http://e-journal.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/jefl

OAI address of JEFL is available at http://e-journal.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/jefl/oai

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

stats View My Stats

Flag Counter