The effectiveness of combining the keyword mnemonic with retrieval practice on L2 vocabulary learning in Taiwanese EFL classes
Abstract
Previous research suggests that combining the keyword mnemonic and retrieval practice produces significant benefits for L2 vocabulary learning, but only for the receptive aspect. This study examines the effectiveness of combining the two methods for productive L2 vocabulary learning. Forty-two 8th-grade Taiwanese EFL learners participated in a four-week instructional treatment. They were divided into three groups with a similar spread of English vocabulary sizes. The learning materials consisted of 21 English words unknown to the participants and equally divided into three sets of equivalent difficulty. Three learning conditions (combined method, retrieval practice, and control) were rotated for each group so that each condition was applied to each set of words one time by one of the three groups. A productive vocabulary test was designed to measure the retention of the words at three different time points after the treatment. Repeated measures ANOVAs revealed that the combined method performed similarly to retrieval practice in the immediate and the one-week delayed posttests but significantly outperformed retrieval practice in the four-week delayed posttest. The predicted superiority of using the combined method over retrieval practice alone in the productive aspect of EFL vocabulary learning over the longer term was confirmed in the present study.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFArticle Metrics
Abstract view : 107 times | PDF view : 45 timesReferences
Atkinson, R. C. (1975). Mnemotechnics in second-language learning. American Psychologist, 30(8), 821-828. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077029
Atkinson, R. C., & Raugh, M. R. (1975). An application of the mnemonic keyword to the acquisition of Russian vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 1(2), 126-133. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.1.2.126
Avila, E., & Sadoski, M. (1996). Exploring new applications of the keyword method to acquire English vocabulary. Language Learning, 46(3), 379-395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01241.x
Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: an overview. Journal of communication disorders, 36(3), 189-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00019-4
Beaton, A., Gruneberg, M., Hyde, C., Shufflebottom, A., & Sykes, R (2005). Facilitation of receptive and productive foreign vocabulary learning using the keyword method: the role of image quality. Memory, 13(5), 458-471. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210444000395
Brown, T. S., & Perry, F. L., Jr. (1991). A comparison of three learning strategies for ESL vocabulary acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 25(4), 655-670. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587081
Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A.B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 904-911. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5
Butler, A. C. (2010). Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(5), 1118–1133. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019902
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (2004). Extensions of the Paivio, Yuille, and Madigan (1968) norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 371-383. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195584
Davoudi, M., & Yousefi, D. (2016). The effect of keyword method on vocabulary retention of senior high school EFL learners in Iran, Journal of Education and Practice, 7(11), 106-113.
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., Acton, M., Voelkel, A. R., & Etkind, R. (2007). Comparing and combining retrieval practice and the keyword mnemonic for foreign vocabulary learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(4), 499–526. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1287
Kang, S. H. K., Gollan, T. H., & Pashler, H. (2013). Don't just repeat after me: retrieval practice is better than imitation for foreign vocabulary learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1259–1265. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0450-z
Karpicke, J. D., & Bauernschmidt, A. (2011). Spaced recall: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(5), 1250-1257. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023436
Karpicke J. D., & Roediger H. L. (2010). Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials? Memory & Cognition, 38, 116–124. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.1.116
Khorasgani, A. T., & Khanehgir, M. (2017). Teaching new vocabulary to Iranian young FL learners: using two methods total physical response and keyword method. International Journal of Languages' Education and Teaching, 5(1), 90-100. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED574161.pdf
Köksal, O., & Çekiç, A. (2014). The effects of mnemonic keyword on 8th graders’ L2 vocabulary learning, Educational Alternatives, 12, 1030-1047. https://www.scientific-publications.net/en/article/1000586/
Li, J., Zhang E-H., He, X., Zhang, H., Gou, H., Wang, X., Wang, S., & Cao, H-W. (2022). Retrieval practice enhances learning and memory retention of French words in Chinese-English bilinguals. Lingua, 272, 103294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2022.103294
Logan, J. M., & Balota, D. A. (2008). Expanded vs. equal interval spaced recall practice: exploring different schedules of spacing and retention interval in younger and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 15(3), 257-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825580701322171
Miyatsu, T., & McDaniel, M. A. (2019). Adding the keyword mnemonic to retrieval practice: a potent combination for foreign language vocabulary learning? Memory & Cognition, 47, 1328–1343. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00936-2
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 255–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084295
Raugh, M. R., & Atkinson, R. C. (1975). A mnemonic method for learning a second language vocabulary. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0078665
Rodriguez, M., & Sadoski, M. (2000). Effects of rote, context, keyword, and context/keyword methods on retention of vocabulary in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50(2), 385-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00121
Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40064526
Sagarra, N., & Alba, M. (2006). The key is in the keyword: L2 vocabulary learning methods with beginning learners of Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 90(2), 228-243. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3876872
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Siriganjanavong, V. (2013). The mnemonic keyword method: effects on the vocabulary acquisition and retention. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n10p1
Wixted, J. T., & Ebbesen, E. B. (1991). On the form of forgetting. Psychological Science, 2(6), 409-415. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40062717
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v13i2.6313
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 107 timesPDF - 45 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 THE AUTHOR(S)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JEFL is published by Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya in collaboration with the Association of Teachers of English Linguistics, Literature and Education (ELITE Association) in Indonesia [MoU manuscript].
Editor and Administration Address:
Department of English Language Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya, Jalan G. Obos Komplek Islamic Centre Palangka Raya, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia, Postal Code 73111, Email: jefl@iain-palangkaraya.ac.id, Website: http://e-journal.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/jefl
OAI address of JEFL is available at http://e-journal.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/jefl/oai

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.