EFL students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v14i1.6503Keywords:
EFL students’ engagement, gamification tools, learning management systems (LMS), mobile technologies, post-pandemic teaching and learning, student response systems (SRS), technological toolsAbstract
Nowadays, in the post-pandemic educational landscape, it is intriguing to investigate whether technological supports are still relevant and necessary. This article critically summarizes and reviews the effect of technology utilization on students' engagement presented in a study by Yu et al. (2022). Then, using a mixed-methods design, this study explored English as a foreign language (EFL) studentsDownloads
References
Atawneh, S., Al-Akhras, M., AlMomani, I., Liswi, A., & Alawairdhi, M. (2020). Collaborative mobile-learning architecture based on mobile agents. Electronics, 9(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9010162
Baldock, B. L., Fernandez, A. L., Franco, J., Provencher, B. A., & McCoy, M. R. (2021). Overcoming the challenges of remote instruction: Using mobile technology to promote active learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(3), 833
Bolatli, G., & Kizil, H. (2021). The effect of mobile learning on student success and anxiety in teaching genital system anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 15(1), 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2059
Butler, A., Camilleri, M., Creed, A., & Zutshi, A. (2021). The use of mobile learning technologies for corporate training and development: A contextual framework. In M. A. Camilleri (Ed.), Strategic corporate communication in the digital age (pp. 115
Cahyono, B. Y., Khotimah, K., & Batunan, D. A. (2023). Workable approaches in EFL teaching mediated by mobile technology during the pandemic and post-pandemic: Indonesian EFL teachers
Cavus, N. (2011). Investigating mobile devices and LMS integration in higher education: Student perspectives. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 1469
Coates, H. (2006). Student engagement in campus-based and online education: University connections. Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Crowder, M., Antoniadou, M., & Stewart, J. (2019). To Blikbook or not to Blikbook: Exploring student engagement of an online discussion platform. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(3), 295
Faridah, N. I. (2022). Bridging up challenges and mentality of online learning from pre to post pandemic to develop ELT performance. Journal of English Educators Society, 7(1), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v7i1.1656
Fauzi, M. F., Murdiono, M., Anindiati, I., Nada, A. L. I., Khakim, R. R., Mauludiyah, L., & Thoifah, I. (2020). Developing Arabic language instructional content in Canvas LMS for the era and post COVID-19 pandemic. Izdihar, 3(3), 161
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59
Haryani, F., & Poniam, B. (2021). Evaluation of learning management systems (LMS) Canvas amidst pandemic: Students
Heiberger, G., & Harper, R. (2008). Have you Facebooked Astin lately? Using technology to increase student involvement. New Directions for Student Services, 124, 19
Hughes, J. N., Luo, W., Kwok, O.-M., & Loyd, L. K. (2008). Teacher-student support, effortful engagement, and achievement: A 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 1
Leavy, P. (2020). The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
Li, Z., Li, Q., Han, J., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Perspectives of hybrid performing arts education in the post-pandemic era: An empirical study in Hong Kong. Sustainability, 14(15), 9194. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159194
Marks, M. H. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Association, 37(1), 153
Nestel, D., Ng, A., Gray, K., Hill, R., Browne, C., Kotsanas, G., Oaten, A., & Browne, C. (2010). Evaluation of mobile learning: Students
Nikou, S. A. (2021). Web-based videoconferencing for teaching online: Continuance intention to use in the post-COVID-19 period. Interaction Design and Architecture(S), 47, 123
Pickering, J. D., & Swinnerton, B. J. (2019). Exploring the dimensions of medical student engagement with technology enhanced learning resources and assessing the impact on assessment outcomes. Anatomical Sciences Education, 12(2), 117
Pontefract, S. K., & Wilson, K. (2019). Using electronic patient records: Defining learning outcomes for undergraduate education. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 58950971. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1466-5
Putra, A. K., Sumarmi, S., Sahrina, A., Fajrilia, A., & Yembuu, B. (2021). Effect of mobile-augmented reality (MAR) in digital encyclopedia on the complex problem solving and attitudes of undergraduate student. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(7), 119
Rumberger, R. W., & Rotermund, S. (2012). The relationship between engagement and high school dropout. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 491-513). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_24
Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1
Suppiah, S. M., Ahmad, M. K., Aziz, A., & Fauzi, M. A. (2023). Synchronous communication in post-pandemic era for higher education. In Advances in social science, education and humanities research (pp. 392
Susilawati, S., & Supriyatno, T. (2020). Online learning through WhatsApp group in improving learning motivation in the era of pandemic and post pandemic COVID-19. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 5(6), 852-859. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i6.13670
Syamdianita, S., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2021). The EFL pre-service teachers
Tapscott, D. (2010). Grown up digital: How the Net generation is changing your world. McGraw-Hill.
Wang, M., Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Hofkens, T., & Linn, J. S. (2016). The Math and Science engagement scales: Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties. Learning and Instruction, 43, 16
Xodabande, I., & Hashemi, M. R. (2022). Learning English with electronic textbooks on mobile devices: Impacts on university students
Yu, Z., & Yi, H. (2020). Acceptance and effectiveness of Rain classroom in linguistics classes. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), 12(2), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijmbl.2020040105
Yu, Z., Yu, L., Xu, Q., Xu, W., & Wu, P. (2022). Effects of mobile learning technologies and social media tools on student engagement and learning outcomes of English learning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 31(3), 381
Zhai, C. (2021). Practical research on college English vocabulary teaching with mobile technology. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 60(1 suppl), 002072092098505. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020720920985057
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
- All articles published in JEFL are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA) license. This means anyone is free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided they give appropriate attribution to the original author(s) and JEFL, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
- Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to JEFL to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
- Although the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA) license do not apply to authors (as the copyright holder of your article, you have no restrictions on your rights), by submitting to JEFL, authors recognize the rights of readers and must grant any third party the right to use their articles to the extent provided by the license.
