The Dynamics of Islamic Jurisprudence in The Eyes of Contemporary Muslims

Meirison Meirison, Desmadi Saharuddin, Husnul Fatarib

Abstract


The emergence of sects and their diversity in Islam is caused by the differences in thought and visions of those who follow these sects. When the differences between the followers of these sects is limited to a mere difference of views on this or jurisprudential issue, it is a disagreement or an acceptable difference. Because there is more than one opinion on one jurisprudential issue, whoever works with this opinion on the issue, action is permissible. And, whoever works on the same issue with another thought, his movement is also acceptable, and this is from the capacity of Islam and its mercy to the nation. By examining several books related to the views of the ulama on the schools of thought, it has opened the way for us to verify. The article carried out a descriptive analysis approach and a comparative study of the opinions of scholars in different schools of thought and the fatwas issued by our official fatwa institutions. The article finds the fanaticism of the sects is one of the causes of the nation's weakness. So, its unity was torn, and its humiliation intensified for the people. And that, they agree on what they agreed upon of the fixed principles, although various problems arise from time to time.


Keywords


Islamic Jurisprudence; Madhab; and Muslim Scholars;

Full Text:

PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 275 times | PDF view : 150 times

References


Al-Hafizh, Rasyid, . Fachrul Rozy, and Zaim Rais. “USUL AL-FIQH: ITS EPISTEMOLOGY, PURPOSE, AND USE.†DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 19, no. 1 (July 31, 2021): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v19i1.1529.

Biá¹­á¹­ÄwÄ«, Muḥammad Ê»Abd al-MuÊ»izz. Falsafat Al-AkhlÄq FÄ« al-Sharīʻah al-IslÄmÄ«yah: DirÄsah FÄ« Ê»ilam QawÄÊ»id al-Fiqh. Al-ṬabÊ»ah al-Ūlá. Ê»AmmÄn: al-MaÊ»had al-ʻĀlamÄ« lil-Fikr al-IslÄmÄ«, Maktab al-Urdun, 2018.

Firdaus, Yelmi Eri. “THE PERISHED MADHHABS AND THEIR IMAMS IN HISTORICAL REVIEW†3, no. 2 (2021): 16.

Haroen, Nasrun. Ushul fiqh. Jakarta: Logos, 1996.

Yanggo, H.T., Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Syarif Hidayatullah (Jakarta), and Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Syarif Hidayatullah (Jakarta). Masail Fiqhiyah: Kajian Hukum Islam Kontemporer. Angkasa, 2005. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=xw7KZwEACAAJ.

ZaqzÅ«q, MaḥmÅ«d ḤamdÄ«, and Egypt, eds. Mawsūʻat Al-Ḥaá¸Ärah al-IslÄmÄ«yah. Silsilat Al-MawsūʻÄt al-IslÄmÄ«yah al-Mutakhaṣṣiá¹£ah 4. al-QÄhirah: JumhÅ«rÄ«yat Má¹£r al-Ê»ArabÄ«yah, WizÄrat al-AwqÄf, al-Majlis al-AÊ»lá lil-Shuʼūn al-IslÄmÄ«yah, 2005.

ZuḥailÄ«, Wahba az-. al-Fiqh al-islÄmÄ« wa-adillatuhÅ«: aÅ¡-Å¡Ämil li-ʾl-adilla aÅ¡-Å¡arʿīya wa-ʾl-ÄrÄ al-maá¸habÄ«ya wa-ahamm an-naẓarÄ«yÄt al-fiqhÄ«ya wa-taḥqÄ«q al-aḥÄdīṯ an-nabawÄ«ya wa-taḫrīǧihÄ mulḥaqan bihÄ« fahrasa alfÄbÄʾīya Å¡Ämila li-ʾl-mauá¸Å«Ê¿Ät wa-ʾl-masÄʾil al-fiqhÄ«ya. Ǧuzʾ 11: al-FahÄris al-Ê¿Ämma: fahrasa alfabÄʾȳia Å¡Ämila li-ʾl-ÄyÄt wa-ʾl-aḥÄdīṯ wa-ʾl-mauá¸Å«Ê¿Ät al-fiqhÄ«ya. Nachdr. der vierten verb. Ausg. DimaÅ¡q BairÅ«t: DÄr al-fikr, 2002.

Ø§Ù„Ø£ÙØºØ§Ù†ÙŠ, محمد أحمد الحقاني, and محمد عميم الإحسان المجددي/البركتي البنجلاديشي. قواعد الÙقه ÙÙŠ Ùقه الإمام أبي Ø­Ù†ÙŠÙØ© النعمان. Dar Al Kotob Al Ilmiyah دار الكتب العلمية, 2020. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=1nK0DwAAQBAJ.

الإسلامية, كويت وزارة الأوقا٠والشئون. الموسوعة الÙقهية. الموسوعة الÙقهية, v. 40. دولة الكويت، وزارة الأوقا٠والشئون الإسلامية،, 2008. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=gn4etQEACAAJ.

الحاج, عبد الرحمن. “التأصيل الÙقهي ÙÙŠ الاجتهاد الحديث: تطويع الÙقه لمقتضيات العصر.†Journal of Islamic Ethics 3, no. 1–2 (December 27, 2019): 64–89. https://doi.org/10.1163/24685542-12340032.

القروي, محمد العربي. الخلاصة الÙقهية على مذهب السادة المالكية. منشورات محمد علي بيضون، دار الكتب العلمية،, 2009. https://books.google.ws/books?id=OzbrAQAACAAJ.

الله, حسين، سيد عبد, سراج، محمد أحمد, محمد، علي جمعة, بدران، أحمد جابر, and مركز الدراسات الÙقهية والاقتصادية (القاهرة، مصر). المقارنات التشريعية: بين القوانين الوضعية المدنية والتشريع الإسلامي : مقارنة بين Ùقه اقانون Ø§Ù„ÙØ±Ù†Ø³ÙŠ ÙˆÙ…Ø°Ù‡Ø¨ الإمام مالك بن أنس ... المقارنات التشريعية: بين القوانين الوضعية المدنية والتشريع الإسلامي : مقارنة بين Ùقه اقانون Ø§Ù„ÙØ±Ù†Ø³ÙŠ ÙˆÙ…Ø°Ù‡Ø¨ الإمام مالك بن أنس. دار السلام للطباعة والنشر والتوزيع والترجمة،, 2001. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Pg_YAAAAMAAJ.

حسين, Ø¹Ø±ÙØ¬ØŒ عبد الإله بن, and Ḥ.Ä€. Ê»AwnÄ«. â€Ø§Ù„مناهج الÙقهية المعاصرة :â€: â€Ø¹Ø±Ø¶ وتحليل /â€. Ä€fÄq lil-Nashr, 2015. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=2StWAQAACAAJ.

مجموعة Ø§Ù„ÙØªØ§ÙˆÙ‰ لشيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية - ج 4 - Ù…ÙØµÙ„ الاعتقاد. IslamKotob, n.d. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=NDlHCwAAQBAJ.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/elma.v12i1.3939

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 275 times
PDF - 150 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Meirison Meirison, Desmadi Saharuddin, Husnul Fatarib

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

El-Mashlahah is published by Sharia Faculty of State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Palangka Raya in association with the Asosiasi Dosen Hukum Keluarga Islam (ADHKIIndonesia [MoU].

Editor and Administration Address:

Building A1, Sharia Faculty of State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Palangka Raya, G. Obos St., Islamic Centre, Palangka Raya, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia, Postal Code 73112

email: maslahah@iain-palangkaraya.ac.id

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License