Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Inquiry Learning untuk Pembelajaran Daring dengan Platform Seesaw

Wa Fatma, Dwi Sulisworo

Abstract


Pembelajaran fisika secara online berbasis inquiry learning memiliki tujuan untuk mengembangkan lingkungan belajar secara online dengan menggunakan aplikasi Seesaw untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa SMA pada materi gerak lurus. Dalam pengembangan ini mencakup tiga tahapan, yaitu pembuatan rancangan awal pembelajaran dengan Seesaw, validasi oleh ahli, dan uji kelompok kecil pengguna. Setelah melakukan analisis validasi dan uji coba pengguna pada siswa sekolah menengah atas dari indikator kegunaan, kemudahan penggunaan, kemudahan belajar dan kepuasan, maka diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa rancangan pembelajaran LMS dengan aplikasi seesaw terbukti praktis dan layak digunakan. Adapun implikasi dalam pembelajaran dengan menerapkan pembelajaran berbantuan seesaw, siswa lebih termotivasi untuk belajar online.


Keywords


Fisika; inovasi pembelajaran; pembelajaran inkuiri; LMS; Seesaw

Full Text:

PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 209 times | PDF view : 213 times

References


Anam K. 2016. Pembelajaran Berbasis Inkuiri Metode dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Aeni AF, Mutaqin A & Setiani Y. 2016. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Problem Based Learning untuk Pembelajaran Daring dengan Platform Edmodo. 5(2): 1661–1674.

Barac M. 2017. Science Teacher Education in the Twenty-First Century: a Pedagogical Framework for Technology-Integrated Social Constructivism. Research in Science Education. 47: 283-303

Campbell T., Zhang D., & Neilson D. 2011. Model based inquiry in the high school ophysics classroom: An exploratory study of implementation and Outcomes. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 20(3): 258-269.

Chiu TFK. 2021. Applying the self-determination theory ( SDT ) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1(1): 1–17.

Coates H., James, R., & Baldwin G. 2005. A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning. 19–36.

Corbillon AV. 2021. Integrating Mathematical Modeling In Seesaw To Enhance Engagement And Problem - Solving. International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning (IC4E 2021), Tokyo, Japan. ACM, NewYork, NY,USA.7: 6–12.

Dharmawan. 2014. Pengembangan E-Learning: Teori Dan Desain. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Hong J., Hsiao H., Chen P., Lu C., Tai K., & Tsai C. 2021. Computers & Education Critical attitude and ability associated with students ’ self-confidence and attitude toward. Computers & Education, 166: 104172.

Husni. 2020. The Effect of Inquiry-based Learning on Religious Subjects Learning Activities: An Experimental Study in High Schools. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 8(1).

Krahenbuhl KS. 2016. Student-centered Education and Constructivism: Challenges, Concerns, and Clarity for Teachers. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas. 1(1): 1-9.

Kuhn D., Black J., Keselman A., & Kaplan D. 2000. The Development of Cognitive Skills to Support Inquiry Learning. Cognition and Instruction, 18(4): 495–523.

Maknun J. 2020. Implementation of Guided Inquiry Learning Model to Improve Understanding Physics Concepts and Critical Thinking Skill of Vocational High School Students. 13(6): 117–130.

Mahnegar F. 2012. Learning Management System. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(12): 144-150.

Meishar-Tal H., Kurtz G., & Pieterse E. 2012. Facebook groups as LMS: A case study. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 13(4): 33-48.

Muijs D & Reynolds D. 2008. Effective Teaching Teori dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Nugroho SA. 2016. Peningkatan Keaktifan dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Melalui Penerapan Teori Konstruktivisme Berbasis Media Wondershare Quizcreator. Indonesian Journal of Curriculum. 4(2): 73–78.

Quitaneg-abaniel A. 2021. Evaluation of Open Inquiry Learning Model for Physics Teachers. 15(1): 98–123.

Rivero V. 2012. How to manage all that learning. Internet@Schools. 19(1): 9-12.

Sadiman, Arief S, 2008. Media Pendidikan. Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada

Sugrah N. 2019. No Title. Humanika, Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 19(September), 121–138.

Trianto. 2007. Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik. Jakarta : Prestasi Pustaka

Walker CH. 2015. Increasing Student Engagement in the Secondary Math Classroom. LSU Master’s Theses. 3628.

Walker CO, Greene BA, Mansell RA. 2006. Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences. 16(1): 1–12.

Wichadee S. 2015. Factors related to faculty members' attitude and adoption of a learning management system. TOJET : The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4).

Wijayanti W. Maharta N., & Suana W. 2017. Pengembangan Perangkat Blended Learning Berbasis Learning Management System. 1–12.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/jpsp.v2i1.3776

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 209 times
PDF - 213 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Wa Fatma, Dwi Suisworo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





Journal Management Address Map:


Jurnal Penelitian Sains dan Pendidikan,
ISSN 2775-6580 (online-electronics), 2776-7531 (print)
�2021-2022 IAIN Palangka Raya