Perpetual Peace: An Analysis of Kant’s Theory of Peace in Terms of The Islamic Worldview

Iqbal Maulana Alfiansyah, Mohamad Latief, Naqia Salsabila Taslim

Abstract


This study critically discussed the concept of 'perpetual peace' according to Immanuel Kant. For Kant, peace is absolute, and war must be avoided. Kant's concept of peace departs from his philosophical ideas about humans and ethics. According to the researcher's hypothesis, Kant's concept of peace is problematic and not compatible with the concept of peace in Islam. This study aimed to describe Immanuel Kant's concept of perpetual peace and the concept of peace in Islam. In addition, it also analyzed how Kant's concept of perpetual peace is viewed from the Islamic worldview. This research was library research, and the methods used were descriptive, analytical, and comparative. This research concluded that Kant's concept of peace had several philosophical and practical problems. Philosophically, Kant's concept of peace revolves around the concept of man, ethics, and causality, which tend to deny the element of God in it. In practical terms, Kant's idea that war should not exist is a dream that is difficult to realize. His opinion about the peace triangle also leaves many problems. In contrast to that, in the view of Islam, war is allowed to fight injustice and aim for the creation of goodness or maslahah, justice, and global peace. War in Islam is also regulated based on ethical and humanitarian principles. This is based on the Islamic view of humans who simultaneously have a good and a wrong side. In addition, Islam focuses more on human nature and its perspective on reality and life to achieve peace. The Qur'an, with normative teachings such as equality between humans, justice, honesty, the nature of qanaah, can be used as a normative and practical basis for achieving perpetual peace

Keywords : Perpetual Peace; Immanuel Kant; Islamic Worldview


Full Text:

PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 283 times | PDF view : 264 times

References


Abdullah, Muhammad Amin. 1991. ‘Konsepsi Etika Ghazali Dan Immanuel Kant (Kajian Kritis Konsepsi Etika Mistik Dan Rasional)’. Al-Jamiah 45.

———. 1992. The Idea of Universality of Ethical Norms in Ghazali and Kant. Turki: Diyanet Vakfi.

Abu-Nimer, Mohammed. 2000. ‘A Framework for Nonviolence and Peacebuilding in Islam’. Journal of Law and Religion 15 (1/2): 217–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/1051519.

Al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. 2015. On Justice and the Nature of Man. Kuala Lumpur: IBFIM & Akademi Kenegaraan.

Andaru, Djarot Dimas Achmad. 2021. ‘Pendekatan Konsep Ta’awun Dalam Siyar Terhadap Konflik Tumpang Tindih Kedaulatan Wilayah Udara Dan Flight Information Region: Alternatif Penyelesaian Kasus Tumpang Tindih Wilayah Udara Indonesia Dan Flight Information Region Singapura’. Journal of Islamic Law Studies 3 (2). https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jils/vol3/iss2/4.

Bartens, K. 1975. Ringkasan Sejarah Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Bastiat, Frederic. 1850. The Law. Los Angeles: Enhanced Media Publishing.

Batool, Saminah, Oumar Saleem, Ayesha Jadon, Talib Ali Awan, Waleed Khan, and Maria Mann. 2021. ‘Ethics Of War In Islamic Perspective’. Webology 18 (2). https://www.webology.org/abstract.php?id=2267.

Baylis, J, and S Smith. 2005. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.

Burchill, Scott, Andrew Linklater, Richard Devetak, Jack Donnely, Matthew Peterson, Christian Reus-Smit, and Jacqui True. 2001. Theories of International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Doyle, Michael, and Geoffrey Carlson. 2008. ‘Silence of the Laws? Conceptions of International Relations and International Law in Hobbes, Kant, and Locke’. Colum. J. Transnat’l. L. 46 (January): 648.

Dugis, V. 2016. Teori Hubungan Internasional; Perspektif-Perspektif Klasik. Surabaya: Cakra Studi Global Strategis.

Esposito, John. 1996. Islam and Democracy. London: Oxford University Press.

Fahey, J.J, and Amstrong. 1991. A Peace Reader Essentials Reading on War, Justice, Non Violence and World Order. New York: Paulist Press.

Gallie, B.W. 1980. Philosophers of Peace and War. London: Cambridge University Press.

Galtung, J, and D Fischer. 2013. Johan Galtung: Pioneer of Peace Research. New York: Springer.

Gilady, Lilach. 2017. ‘Triangle or “Trilemmaâ€: Rousseau and the “Kantian Peaceâ€â€™. Journal of International Relations and Development 20 (1): 135–61. https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2015.3.

Howard, W. 2003. Filsafat Politik Kant. Surabaya: JP-Press & IMM.

Jackson, R, and G Sorensen. 1999. Introduction to International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jose, Abraham Hino Samuel. 2021. ‘Indonesia’s 2020 New Paradigm Of Collaborative Strategic Outlook In The South-South Cooperation (SSC) as The Bridge-Builder For The Post-Pandemic Development’. Verity: Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional (International Relations Journal) 12 (24): 5–20. https://doi.org/10.19166/verity.v12i24.3278.

Kant, Immanuel. 1964. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals,Translated and ZAnalyzed by H.J. Paton. New York: Harper Torchbook.

———. 1989. Perpetual Peace, Translated by Lewis White Beck. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Khan, M. A. Muqtedar. 2019. Islam and Good Governance: A Political Philosophy of Ihsan. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54832-0.

Khan, Maulana Wahiduddin. 2000. Islam and Peace. Delhi: Goodword Books.

Lega, Fransiskus Sales. 2016. ‘Filsafat Politik Kant Dan Relevansinya Bagi Perlindungan Martabat Manusia’. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Missio 8 (1): 20–41.

Losi, Zainuddin. 2018. ‘Political Ethics From An Islamic Perspective’. Indonesia Prime 3 (1): 94–105.

Muslih, M. Kholid. 2019. Worldview Islam: Pembahasan Tentang Konsep Konsep Penting Dalam Islam. Ponorogo: Direktorat Islamisasi Ilmu UNIDA.

Nursita, Rizki Dian, and Ahmad Sahide. 2019. ‘The Concept of Peace in Islam and Its Relevance to International Relations’. Al-Albab 8 (2): 211–24. https://doi.org/10.24260/alalbab.v8i2.1218.

Nursita, Rizki Dian, and Surwandono. 2017. ‘Gagasan Democratic Peace Dalam Politik Luar Negeri Amerika Serikat’. Journal of Islamic World and Politics 1 (1): 27–39. https://doi.org/10.18196/jiwp.1102.

Nuscheler, F. 2005. ‘Kant’s “Perpetual Peace†and the Concept of Global Governance-Vision or Illusion’ Discursus (4): 2.

Perrottet, Claude. 2009. ‘Immanuel Kant’s Perpetual Peace: The New World Order of Critical Philosophy’. The Journal of Global Development and Peace, 4–33.

Russet, Bruce. 2010. ‘Liberalism’. In International Relations Theories : Discipline and Diversity, edited by Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith. New York: Oxford University Press.

Setiawan, Azhari, and Alfajri. 2018. ‘Operasi Kontra Teror Koalisi Global Dalam Menghadapi Pergerakan Islamic State of Iraq and Syiria (ISIS)’. Jurnal Dinamika Pemerintahan 2 (2): 143–73.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/njppi.v6i2.3978

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 283 times
PDF - 264 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-Berbagi Serupa 4.0 Internasional.
 

Editor and Administration Address

NALAR: Jurnal Peradaban dan Pemikiran Islam
Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Dakwah IAIN Palangka Raya
Jl. G. Obos (Kompleks Islamic Center) No. 24, Palangka Raya, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia

Phone: (0536) 3226356
Website: http://e-journal.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/nalar/
Email: jurnal-nalar@iain-palangkaraya.ac.id, mualimin@iain-palangkaraya.ac.id, heri.setiawan@iain-palangkaraya.ac.id

 

Flag Counter