Email this article 
Leadership Implementation Analysis As Brand Image in Military Organizations: Evidence from Indonesia
Abstract
This study seeks to understand and explore field leadership as a brand image in military organizations by analyzing the experiences and perceptions of senior military personnel who have experienced military officers who have led teams, units or combat units. This type of research is descriptive qualitative research with an exploratory study approach. All data collected in this study were obtained by conducting interviews, supported by the experience of researchers and direct observation at the military command headquarters and strengthened by limited and confidential published military literature studies. The results of this study indicate that the implementation of field leadership as a brand image at Kodim 0732/Sleman identified through its indicator aspects has been well implemented. This explains that good military leadership is able to represent the brand image of the organization. Leaders who care and leaders who promote exemplary are the keywords for the success of every military officer in successfully forming a positive brand image both individually and organizationally within the Indonesian National Armed Forces.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFArticle Metrics
Abstract view : 336 times | PDF view : 316 timesReferences
Akademi Angkatan Laut (AAL). (2011). Kepemimpinan TNI AL. Paket Instruksi (Modul): Bumimoro, Markas Besar Angkatan Laut.
Altheide, D., & Johnson, J. (1998). Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. (pp. 283-312). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Andreescu, V. & Vito, G. F. (2010). An exploratory study on ideal leadership behavior: The opinions of American police managers. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 12(4), 567-583.
Avolio, B. J. (2001). Winning with a full range of leadership. Military Review, 81(2), 54.
Baran, B., & Scott, C. (2010). Organizing ambiguity: Aground theory of leadership and sensemaking within dangerous contexts. Military Psychology, 22, S42-S69.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1995). The multifactor leadership questionnaire (form R, revised). Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.
Campbell, D. J., Hannah, S. T., & Matthews, M. D. (2010). Leadership in military and other dangerous contexts: Introduction to the special topic issue. Military Psychology, 22, S1-S14.
Chen, G., & Bliese, P. (2002). The role of different levels of leadership in predicting selfand collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 549- 556.
Chiok Foong Loke, J. (2001). Leadership behaviors: Effects on job satisfaction, productivity and organizational commitment. Journal of Nursing Management, 9(4), 191-204.
Conger, J. A. (1985). Charismatic leadership in business: An exploratory study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Business Administration, Harvard University.
Conger, J. A. (1998). Qualitative research as the cornerstone methodology for understanding leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 9(1), 107-121.
Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Dakyns, H. G. (1897). The works of Xenophon. London: Macmillan and Co.
Eisner, E. W. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York: Macmillan.
Fields, D. L. (2002). Taking the measure of work: A guide to validated scales for organizational research and diagnosis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fisher, K., Hutchings, K., & Sarros, J. (2010). The “bright” and “shadow” aspects of in extremis leadership. Military Psychology, 22, S89-S116.
Fryer, B. (2004). Accentuate the positive. Harvard Business Review, 82(2), 22-23.
Glassman, T. S. (2008). Job satisfaction of the U.S. Army Logistics Officer Corps: An empirical investigation within the ranks during the Global War on Terrorism. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Capella, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, 78-90.
Halpin, A W. (1955). The leader behavior and leadership ideology of educational administrators and aircraft commanders. Harvard Educational Review, 25, 18-32.
Hannah, S. T., Campbell, D. J., & Matthews, M. D. (2010). Advancing a research agenda for leadership in dangerous contexts. Military Psychology, 22, S157-S189.
Hannah, S. T., Uhl-Bien, M., Avolio, B., & Cavarretta, F. (2009). A framework for examining leadership in extreme contexts. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 897-919.
Hourani, L. L.; Graham, W. F.; Sorenson, D., Yuan, H., Bray, R., Wheeless, S. C., et al. (1996). 1995 perceptions of wellness and readiness assessment (POWR’95) methodology report (NHRC Report No. 96-91). San Diego, CA: Naval Health Research Center.
House, R. J., & Aditya, R. N. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis? Journal of Management, 23(3), 409.
Klein, J. J. (2007). The relationship between job satisfaction and leadership practices: A survey-based analysis of full-time business faculty in the Wisconsin Technical College system. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Capella, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Kouzes, J. J., & Posner, B. Z. (1997). The leadership challenge: How to keep getting extraordinary things done in organizations. San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons.
LeCompte, M. D., & Goetz, J. P. (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 51, 31-60.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Lowe, K., Kroeck, K., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review. The Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385-425.
Martin, F. C. (2006). The relationship between leadership practices and job satisfaction: A survey analysis of National Aeronautics and Space Administration employees at the Langley Research Center. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Capella, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Myers, S. E. (2001). The principal as a key factor in teacher job satisfaction: Elementary teacher’s perceptions of leadership behaviors and their effect on teacher job satisfaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Nagara, Dimas Bintang (2015). Kepemimpinan Lapangan di Lngkungan TNI http://www.kompasiana.com/putrawiwoho/kepemimpinan-lapangan-di-lingkungan-tni_56304d7e517a613206a9b11b
Spector, P. E. (1985). Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: Development of the job satisfaction survey. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13(6), 693-713.
Steuben, F. W. (1779). Regulations for the order and discipline of the troops of the United States, Part I. Philadelphia, PA: Styner and Crist.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Suwandi, Iin. (2015). Kepemimpinan Lapangan di Lingkungan TNI. https://www.kabarindonesia.com/berita.php?pil=20&jd=Kepemimpinan+Lapangan+di+Lingkungan+TNI&dn=20151103091129.
(18 November 2015).
Swearingen, S. (2004). Nursing leadership characteristics: Effect of nursing job satisfaction and retention of baby boomer and generation X nurses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida.
Sweeney, P. (2010). Do soldiers reevaluate trust in their leaders prior to combat operations? Military Psychology, 22, S70-S88.
Verren, Tatiana A. (2012). Comparative Analysis of Soldiers’ Perceptions of a Military Leader’s Behavior within the Dangerous and within The Conventional Context. Desertation: Capella University.
Vincus, A. A., Ornstein, M. L., Lentine, D. A., Baird, T. U., Chen, J. C., Walker, J. A., et al. (1999). Health status of military females and males in all segments of the U.S. military: Final report (RTI Report 6728/006-FR). Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/jaq.v7i2.5854
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Kristanto Setio Hari Purnomo, Andi Wahyu Saputra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.